Bill Weld: Government should protect abortion access


LEANING TOWARD VOTING FOR YOU, GOVERNOR JOHNSON.>>GOVERNOR JOHNSON, ON YOUR WEBSITE YOU STATE THAT A WOMAN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE IS THE LAW OF THE LAND AND THAT IF A WOMAN WANTS TO EXERCISE THAT RIGHT, SHE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO SO WITHOUT BEING SUBJECT TO PERSECUTION OR DENIED HEALTH CARE ACCESS. HOWEVER, STATES LIKE TEXAS CONTINUOUSLY PUT LAWS IN PLACE THAT RESTRICT ABORTION SERVICES AND CLINICS. AS A LIBERTARIAN, WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S ROLE IN ENSURING A WOMAN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE IN EVERY STATE?>>WELL, WHAT PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND RIGHT NOW, IT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND. THE LAW OF THE LAND IS NOT ROE V WADE, IT IS KR VERSUS PLANNED PARENTHOOD. A WOMAN HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE ABORTION UP TO POINT OF VIABILITY OF THE FETUS, AND THEY DEFINED VIABILITY OF THE FETUS AS SUSTAINING THE LIFE OF THE FETUS, EVEN IF BY ARTIFICIAL MEANS. THAT’S THE LAW OF THE LAND. WE ARE NOT LOOKING TO CHANGE THE LAW OF THE LAND IN ANY WAY. BOTTOM LINE, WHAT A DIFFICULT DECISION. CAN THERE BE A MORE DIFFICULT DECISION IN ANYONE’S LIFE OTHER THAN, TALKING ABOUT THE WOMAN NOW FACING ABORTION, THAN THAT DECISION. BUT THAT’S A DECISION THAT SHOULD LIE STRICTLY WITH THE WOMAN INVOLVED.>>I THINK IT IS OKAY FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO BE INVOLVED IN ENSURING CLINIC ACCESS, THA

28 Replies to “Bill Weld: Government should protect abortion access”

  1. abortion introduced by your rulers to curb the population just another way they do it…fortunately using some history and research has absolutely nothing to do with facebook or tail gate party's or football so it isnt important.Yep waking up everyday is like taking a rocket ship to planet moron.And yes i am flat out attacking you stupid fucks who refuse to see the game being played deal with it …or simply fuck off k thanks

  2. I do believe a woman has the right to control her own body, and also feel a new baby has the right to live and not be killed because at the time a woman has a baby in her belly the woman has no choice to kill a baby… at min the law should be after 20 weeks and should be much less if never have the ability to have government pay for her Abortion… People that want abortions should experience what will happen to her own baby… If a woman doesn't have the right to kill her 6-month-old baby that is outside her belly then she also shouldn't be given the right to kill a 6-month-old baby inside her belly… its just sick and wrong the problem is that most people don't have enough info to know its wrong and being selfish to think her only choice would be to kill the baby

  3. If these are libertarians the party is over. Ron Paul is a libertarian. These are just leftists redressed to funnel liberty-lovers into the godlessness that spiritually aborted the former-Soviet bloc. Trump Akbar!

  4. These guys have no chance & they were put in to take away from Trump. They are actually helping Hillary get elected. Don't take the establishment's sh*t vote Trump.

  5. You guys really aren't very libertarian….
    Just by using the phrase "good government" you're selling yourselves out.

  6. The Constitution doesn't declare a woman's right to do with her baby's body what she chooses. It is not a godless document.

  7. The heart of the mother dies with the child. Exercise your right to marry a great father and become a great mother. No one wrote the Constitution to celebrate dehumanization.

  8. If you'd like to help end the 2 party system, on Facebook and YouTube join No More 2 Party System.
    You can start a local chapter or contribute vid to our channel.
    #nomore2partysystem

  9. YEAH HUMANS LAW NOT GOD WHY IS IT OK TO MURDER A BABY WHO CAN NOT FIGHT BACK THAT IS A COWARDS WAY OUT OF HAVING TO BE RESPONSBLE.   IT IS NOT BETTER THAN THESE MASS SHOOTINGS.  PEOPLE PLEASE OPEN YOUR EYES AND NOW ABOUT BIOLOGY.   CAN PEOPLE TELL ME IF ABORTION IS NOT MURDERING A BABY THEN WHAT ARE THEY TERMINATING.   IF PREGNANT THAN WHAT ARE YOU PREGNANT WITH RATHER YOU CALL IT AN EMBRO FETIS OR A BABY SOMETHING IS A LIVE TO BE ABLE TO TERMINATE MEANS SOMETHING HAS BEEN MURDERED OR KILLED END DONE WITH STOP LIVING

  10. If women start registering their uteri as corporations, perhaps conservatives will stop interfering with and regulating them.

  11. Preventing access to safe abortions does not prevent abortions. Just because it’s illegal doesn’t mean women don’t have them. When abortion is permitted on broad legal grounds, it is generally safe, and where it is highly restricted, it is typically unsafe.  Banning abortion endangers a woman's health. Making abortion illegal does NOT stop it from occurring. It just forces women to obtain clandestine and unsafe procedures which can result to their death.

  12. so protect abortion but let people have guns? Who is the demographic these Libertarians are going for? confused potheads?

  13. Look at the farce that is CNN  THE CLINTON NEWS NETWORK.  why did you have this in January chris the stooge Cuomo?  no no can't have any other opinion than the Clintons until she locks up the nom

  14. I'm still pretty shocked to find a candidate that actually aligns with how I feel, and states facts to back it up. No fear mongering about how government is trying to take away certain rights, just trying to protect the laws already in place.

  15. It is cowardice to hide the realities of abortion behind the word "choice". What good are "human rights" if you are denied your humanity. Abortion isn't a political issue. It's a human rights issue. Abortion after 12 weeks is just plain cruel barbarity that shouldn't be tolerated in civilized society.

    If there is ever a choice to be made between competing natural rights like life vs liberty; its Life that should get priority. Life comes before liberty. Any "choice" or liberty ends when you decide to end a life, even if it is an undeveloped life. You don't need religion to defend a pro life position, it can be defended on secular grounds, the pro choice one on the other hand sticks to the doctrine of progressiveness; moral relativism. Its interesting how many self professed "liberals" turn into outright laze fare libertarians, and borderline anarchists on the issue of abortion, but then want state intervention with regulating the economy and on all other social issues. Democrats are supposed to be the ones of altruistic ethics, yet on abortion their heartless, barbaric and corrupt. If there is ever a Democratic candidate that is #prolife, I'll never vote republican again. All other issues are compromise, not this.

    It seems Democrats get it right morally/ philosophically; protecting natural rights does justify state involvement, so they've got right platform for protecting life (state intervention based on what's right, what's "moral"). Why then do they not act in line with their principles? Because of abortion lobbyists, Planned Parenthood donates (bribes) millions to Democratic campaigns across all levels, besides they even receive state and federal funding! Why would Dems want to bite the hand that feeds them? For principle? Nah. In short, its corruption; democrats don't care about principles, they want to retain power. And its a complex strategy; demonize people with principles as being "anti women", thrive off the cultural divide and bank on the (low informed) activists shrill for "standing against hate". (What they cannot justify intellectually, they have to get back through culturally divisive rhetoric)

  16. Dave
    Here comes another fantastic President who I would compare to Ron Paul and America is just going to ignore it to stick to idiocy of partisanship. The man is the most fiscally responsible, moderate, lerbertarian on the ticket and the best bet for our country. I guarantee we are going to ignore this chance again buy putting our heads in the sand to stick to dogma rather than actually voting for a new kind of president

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *