Last Missouri Abortion Clinic Could Soon Lose License | All In | MSNBC


Shop Etsy.com Shop Etsy.com>>JUST DAYS AFTER THE GOVERNOR>>JUST DAYS AFTER THE GOVERNOR OF MISSOURI SIGNED A NEAR TOTAL OF MISSOURI SIGNED A NEAR TOTAL ABORTION BAN, THAT STATE MAY BE ABORTION BAN, THAT STATE MAY BE THE FIRST STATE WITHOUT A SINGLE THE FIRST STATE WITHOUT A SINGLE ABORTION CLINIC. ABORTION CLINIC. THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS THREATENING NOT TO RENEW THE THREATENING NOT TO RENEW THE LICENSE TO OFFER ABORTIONS IN LICENSE TO OFFER ABORTIONS IN ST. LOUIS WHICH IS THE ONLY ST. LOUIS WHICH IS THE ONLY PLACE IN MISSOURI THAT PROVIDES PLACE IN MISSOURI THAT PROVIDES THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE. THE LICENSE EXPIRES ON A FRIDAY. THE LICENSE EXPIRES ON A FRIDAY. WAVES OF ABORTION PLANS WAVES OF ABORTION PLANS INCLUDING ALABAMA, GEORGIA, INCLUDING ALABAMA, GEORGIA, MISSISSIPPI, KENTUCKY AND MISSISSIPPI, KENTUCKY AND OTHERS. OTHERS. STATES ARE ALSO AND HAVE BEEN STATES ARE ALSO AND HAVE BEEN MAKING IT MUCH HARDER YEAR BY MAKING IT MUCH HARDER YEAR BY YEAR FOR THE CLINICS TO PARADE. YEAR FOR THE CLINICS TO PARADE. IN 2008, MISSOURI HAD FIVE AND IN 2008, MISSOURI HAD FIVE AND NOW THEY ARE DOWN TO ONE. NOW THEY ARE DOWN TO ONE. SOON THAT NUMBER MIGHT BE ZERO. SOON THAT NUMBER MIGHT BE ZERO. ON A NATIONAL LEVEL, THE SUPREME ON A NATIONAL LEVEL, THE SUPREME COURT UPHELD PART OF INDIANA LAW COURT UPHELD PART OF INDIANA LAW REGULATING THE DISPOSAL OF FETAL REGULATING THE DISPOSAL OF FETAL REMAINS. REMAINS. WHILE THEY SIDE STEPPED THE BAN, WHILE THEY SIDE STEPPED THE BAN, PERHAPS THIS ASPECT WAS A PERHAPS THIS ASPECT WAS A 20-PAGE CONCURRENCE BY CLARENCE 20-PAGE CONCURRENCE BY CLARENCE THOMAS NOT JUST TO ABORTION, BUT THOMAS NOT JUST TO ABORTION, BUT BIRTH CONTROL AS WELL. BIRTH CONTROL AS WELL. HERE WITH ME NOW, RICHARD HERE WITH ME NOW, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL CALLED FOR CONGRESS BLUMENTHAL CALLED FOR CONGRESS TO PASS ABORTION ASPECTS AND TO PASS ABORTION ASPECTS AND MELISSA MURRAY FROM THE SCHOOL MELISSA MURRAY FROM THE SCHOOL OF LAW THE COEDITOR FROM THE NEW OF LAW THE COEDITOR FROM THE NEW BOOK REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND BOOK REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND JUSTICE STORIES. JUSTICE STORIES. LET ME START WITH YOU. LET ME START WITH YOU. CLARENCE THOMAS CONCURRENCE IS A CLARENCE THOMAS CONCURRENCE IS A STRANGE DOCUMENT. STRANGE DOCUMENT. IT HAS NO LEGAL FORCE BECAUSE IT HAS NO LEGAL FORCE BECAUSE IT’S ABOUT THINGS ADJACENT TO IT’S ABOUT THINGS ADJACENT TO WHAT THEY RULED ON, BUT WHAT IS WHAT THEY RULED ON, BUT WHAT IS HE SAYING AND WHAT IS IT HE SAYING AND WHAT IS IT SIGNALLING ABOUT WHERE HE WANTS SIGNALLING ABOUT WHERE HE WANTS THE COURT TO GO? THE COURT TO GO?>>IT’S A SIGNAL TO TAKE UP THE>>IT’S A SIGNAL TO TAKE UP THE QUESTION OF UGENICS ABORTION. QUESTION OF UGENICS ABORTION. LAWS THAT PROHIBIT ABORTIONS IN LAWS THAT PROHIBIT ABORTIONS IN SITUATIONS WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO SITUATIONS WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO TERMINATE BECAUSE OF SEX, RACE, TERMINATE BECAUSE OF SEX, RACE, OR A FETAL ABNORMALITY OR OR A FETAL ABNORMALITY OR DISABILITY. DISABILITY. TO BE CLEAR, I DON’T KNOW THAT TO BE CLEAR, I DON’T KNOW THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF ABORTIONS THERE ARE A LOT OF ABORTIONS BEING DONE BECAUSE SOMEONE BEING DONE BECAUSE SOMEONE DOESN’T LIKE THE SEX OF THEIR DOESN’T LIKE THE SEX OF THEIR PERSPECTIVE CHILD OR DOESN’T PERSPECTIVE CHILD OR DOESN’T LIKE THE RACE OF THEIR CHILD. LIKE THE RACE OF THEIR CHILD. IT’S FETAL ABNORMALITIES WHERE IT’S FETAL ABNORMALITIES WHERE THE FETUS WILL NOT SURVIVE FOR THE FETUS WILL NOT SURVIVE FOR LONG AFTER BIRTH. LONG AFTER BIRTH. THAT’S WHEN IT’S INVOKED. THAT’S WHEN IT’S INVOKED. HE IS LAYING OUT A TRAIL OF HE IS LAYING OUT A TRAIL OF BREAD CRUMBS FOR THE LARGER BREAD CRUMBS FOR THE LARGER CULTURE TO TAKE IT UP AS A CULTURE TO TAKE IT UP AS A CLAIM. CLAIM. HE IS PITCHING THIS AS A RACIAL HE IS PITCHING THIS AS A RACIAL JUSTICE WEDGE ISSUE. JUSTICE WEDGE ISSUE. HE INVOKES THE HISTORY OF HE INVOKES THE HISTORY OF CONTRACEPTION AND THERE IS A CONTRACEPTION AND THERE IS A LIKELY HISTORY AND HE TALKS LIKELY HISTORY AND HE TALKS ABOUT IT. ABOUT IT. MARGARET SANGER, SUPER RACIST. MARGARET SANGER, SUPER RACIST. IT’S AN INCOMPLETE HISTORY AND IT’S AN INCOMPLETE HISTORY AND WOULD LOVE TO TALK TO HIM ABOUT WOULD LOVE TO TALK TO HIM ABOUT THIS. THIS. HE LEAVES OUT THE FACT THAT HE LEAVES OUT THE FACT THAT ABORTION RESTRICTIONS ARE BORN ABORTION RESTRICTIONS ARE BORN OF THIS MOVEMENT. OF THIS MOVEMENT. IN THE 19th CENTURY, THE IN THE 19th CENTURY, THE INTEREST IN CRIMINALIZING INTEREST IN CRIMINALIZING ABORTION WAS BORN OF AN INTEREST ABORTION WAS BORN OF AN INTEREST AND CONCERN THAT NATIVE-BORN AND CONCERN THAT NATIVE-BORN WHITE WOMEN WERE USING ABORTION WHITE WOMEN WERE USING ABORTION AND CONTRA EXCEPTION TO SUSH AND CONTRA EXCEPTION TO SUSH FERTILITY WHILE IMMIGRANT WOMEN FERTILITY WHILE IMMIGRANT WOMEN WERE HAVING TOO MANY CHILDREN. WERE HAVING TOO MANY CHILDREN.>>BOTH SIDES OF PAINTED.>>BOTH SIDES OF PAINTED.>>THIS WAS NOT A PRO OR PRO>>THIS WAS NOT A PRO OR PRO CHOICE ARGUMENT. CHOICE ARGUMENT.>>YOU HAVE THE SUPREME COURT>>YOU HAVE THE SUPREME COURT OPENING THE DOOR. OPENING THE DOOR. A FEW VOTES THAT WANT TO TAKE A FEW VOTES THAT WANT TO TAKE THE RUN AND ROE AND THE THE RUN AND ROE AND THE INCREMENTAL QUESTIONS THAT MAY INCREMENTAL QUESTIONS THAT MAY BE TAKING THEIR SIDE. BE TAKING THEIR SIDE. YOU HAVE STATES PASSING THESE YOU HAVE STATES PASSING THESE RESTRICTIONS. RESTRICTIONS. WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS THE FEDERAL WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S IN TERMS OF THE GOVERNMENT’S IN TERMS OF THE LEGISLATING BRANCHES. LEGISLATING BRANCHES.>>WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT>>WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST DO IS TO PREVENT ALL OF MUST DO IS TO PREVENT ALL OF THESE RESTRICTIONS, NOT JUST THE THESE RESTRICTIONS, NOT JUST THE DRACONIAN AND DEMAGOGUIC LAWS, DRACONIAN AND DEMAGOGUIC LAWS, THE FETAL HEARTBEAT LAWS OF THE FETAL HEARTBEAT LAWS OF ALABAMA AND GEORGIA AND ALABAMA AND GEORGIA AND KENTUCKY, BUT THE RESTRICTIONS KENTUCKY, BUT THE RESTRICTIONS IN MISSOURI, FOR EXAMPLE. IN MISSOURI, FOR EXAMPLE. ON LICENSING REQUIREMENTS WITH ON LICENSING REQUIREMENTS WITH THE WIDTH OF HALLWAYS IN CLINICS THE WIDTH OF HALLWAYS IN CLINICS AND ADMITTING PRIMS. AND ADMITTING PRIMS. I INTRODUCED THE WOMEN’S HEALTH I INTRODUCED THE WOMEN’S HEALTH PROTECTION ACT IN 2013 LAST WEEK PROTECTION ACT IN 2013 LAST WEEK FOR THE FOURTH TIME WITH STRONG FOR THE FOURTH TIME WITH STRONG SUPPORT FROM THE CENTER FOR SUPPORT FROM THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND PLANNED REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD WHO ARE PART OF A PARENTHOOD WHO ARE PART OF A MOVEMENT WHO IS TRYING TO STOP MOVEMENT WHO IS TRYING TO STOP THE RESTRICTIONS. THE RESTRICTIONS.>>DEMOCRATS FROM GENERALLY NOT>>DEMOCRATS FROM GENERALLY NOT DONE THIS. DONE THIS. THE WAY THEY VIEWED THIS IS THAT THE WAY THEY VIEWED THIS IS THAT YOU HAVE ROW AND YOU HAVE TO YOU HAVE ROW AND YOU HAVE TO PRESERVE AS MUCH OF ROE AS PRESERVE AS MUCH OF ROE AS POSSIBLE AND THE STATE POSSIBLE AND THE STATE LEGISLATURE LEGISLATURE LEGISLATURES. LEGISLATURES. KAMALA HARRIS CAME UP WITH A KAMALA HARRIS CAME UP WITH A POLICY THAT IS A VOTING RIGHTS POLICY THAT IS A VOTING RIGHTS ACT FOR CHOICE IS ABORTION ACT FOR CHOICE IS ABORTION RIGHTS. RIGHTS. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SIGN THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SIGN PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE’S RIGHT PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE’S RIGHT TO ACCESS ABORTIONS. TO ACCESS ABORTIONS.>>THESE STATES, ALL OF THEM ARE>>THESE STATES, ALL OF THEM ARE PLAYING A VERY DANGEROUS GAME TO PLAYING A VERY DANGEROUS GAME TO OVERRULE ROW VERSUS WAIT. OVERRULE ROW VERSUS WAIT. KAMALA HARRIS’S PROPOSAL WHICH KAMALA HARRIS’S PROPOSAL WHICH HE HAS COSPONSORED WITH ME AND HE HAS COSPONSORED WITH ME AND TAMMY BALDWIN AND ANOTHER LEADER TAMMY BALDWIN AND ANOTHER LEADER IS THAT THERE WOULD BE THIS IS THAT THERE WOULD BE THIS PRECLEARANCE PROCESS BY THE PRECLEARANCE PROCESS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. I’M FINE WITH THAT CONCEPT. I’M FINE WITH THAT CONCEPT. KEEP IN MIND THIS DEPARTMENT OF KEEP IN MIND THIS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS LIKELY TO CLEAR A LOT JUSTICE IS LIKELY TO CLEAR A LOT OF RESTRICTIONS. OF RESTRICTIONS.>>HERE’S MY QUESTION TO YOU.>>HERE’S MY QUESTION TO YOU. IS THERE A UNIVERSE IN WHICH YOU IS THERE A UNIVERSE IN WHICH YOU HAVE A COURT WILLING TO THROW HAVE A COURT WILLING TO THROW OUT REROE, ONE OF THE MOST OUT REROE, ONE OF THE MOST ASTONISHING REVERSEALS. ASTONISHING REVERSEALS. WOULDN’T THEY JUST SCRAP THAT WOULDN’T THEY JUST SCRAP THAT TOO? TOO?>>THIS GOES BACK TO THE FEET>>THIS GOES BACK TO THE FEET REMAINS LAW. REMAINS LAW. WHAT ARE THEY DOING. WHAT ARE THEY DOING. THEY ARE UPHOLDING THE FETAL THEY ARE UPHOLDING THE FETAL REMAINS LAW WHILE SIDE STEPPING REMAINS LAW WHILE SIDE STEPPING THE QUESTION OF THE LARGER ISSUE THE QUESTION OF THE LARGER ISSUE OF ROE’S VIABILITY. OF ROE’S VIABILITY. Y FETAL REMAINS LAW HAS REAL Y FETAL REMAINS LAW HAS REAL CONCERNS FOR ACCESS FOR WOMEN. CONCERNS FOR ACCESS FOR WOMEN. THIS IS A LAW THAT ADDS TO THE THIS IS A LAW THAT ADDS TO THE COST OF ABORTION IN INDIANA. COST OF ABORTION IN INDIANA. CLINICS EITHER HAVE THE OPTION CLINICS EITHER HAVE THE OPTION OF PASSING THE COST ON TO OF PASSING THE COST ON TO PATIENTS OR ALTERNATIVELY PATIENTS OR ALTERNATIVELY ABSORBING IT THEMSELVES WHICH ABSORBING IT THEMSELVES WHICH MAY DRIVE MANY OF THEM OUT OF MAY DRIVE MANY OF THEM OUT OF BUSINESS. BUSINESS. THAT’S THE POINT. THAT’S THE POINT.>>I WAS TRYING TO GET CLARITY>>I WAS TRYING TO GET CLARITY ON THE LAW. ON THE LAW. IT’S FETAL REMAINS NOT JUST FOR IT’S FETAL REMAINS NOT JUST FOR ABORTIONS AND MISCARRIAGES? ABORTIONS AND MISCARRIAGES?>>THE LANGUAGE IN JUSTINJUSTICE>>THE LANGUAGE IN JUSTINJUSTICE IS TO ELEVATE THE STATUS OF THE IS TO ELEVATE THE STATUS OF THE FETUS. FETUS. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A SEPARATE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A SEPARATE HUMAN. HUMAN.>>DO YOU VIEW THESE — IT SEEMS>>DO YOU VIEW THESE — IT SEEMS LIKE WE ARE HEADED TOWARDS LIKE WE ARE HEADED TOWARDS EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT. EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT. THIS CANNOT HOLD. THIS CANNOT HOLD. THE AGENDA IS CLEAR. THE AGENDA IS CLEAR. MITCH McCONNELL SAYING IF WE HAD MITCH McCONNELL SAYING IF WE HAD AN OPENING IN 2020, WE WOULD AN OPENING IN 2020, WE WOULD CONFIRM IT. CONFIRM IT. IS THAT WHERE YOU SEE THIS IS THAT WHERE YOU SEE THIS GOING? GOING?>>WE ARE HEADING TOWARDS A VERY>>WE ARE HEADING TOWARDS A VERY EXPLOSIVE MOMENT. EXPLOSIVE MOMENT. THAT’S THE RIGHT WAY TO VIEW IT. THAT’S THE RIGHT WAY TO VIEW IT. RIGHT NOW THE DANGER AND THE RIGHT NOW THE DANGER AND THE DAMAGE WILL BE ENDURING BECAUSE DAMAGE WILL BE ENDURING BECAUSE A LOT OF WOMEN FEEL THAT THIS A LOT OF WOMEN FEEL THAT THIS RIGHT IS CRIMINALIZED. RIGHT IS CRIMINALIZED. A LOT OF THESE WOMEN IN THOSE A LOT OF THESE WOMEN IN THOSE STATES WHERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES STATES WHERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES HAVE BEEN IMPOSED ON THE HAVE BEEN IMPOSED ON THE PROVIDERS FEEL MAYBE WRONGLY PROVIDERS FEEL MAYBE WRONGLY THAT IT’S IMPOSED ON THEM AND THAT IT’S IMPOSED ON THEM AND THAT FEAR AND INTIMIDATION IS THAT FEAR AND INTIMIDATION IS PART OF THE PLAYBOOK. PART OF THE PLAYBOOK.>>THE PUBLICITY HAS AN EFFECT>>THE PUBLICITY HAS AN EFFECT OVER AND ABOVE WHAT THE ACTUAL OVER AND ABOVE WHAT THE ACTUAL LAW IS. LAW IS. PEOPLE HAVE BEEN WATCHING NEWS PEOPLE HAVE BEEN WATCHING NEWS REPORTS ABOUT YOU CAN GET 99 REPORTS ABOUT YOU CAN GET 99 YEARS OR THINGS LIKE THAT. YEARS OR THINGS LIKE THAT.>>MORE POINT WHICH IS VERY,>>MORE POINT WHICH IS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. VERY IMPORTANT. THE PROVIDERS AND THE NURSES AND THE PROVIDERS AND THE NURSES AND THE CLINIC ESCORTS ARE ALL

50 Replies to “Last Missouri Abortion Clinic Could Soon Lose License | All In | MSNBC”

  1. the jews are attempting to extort 300,000,000,000 from Poland, the jews want to steal over 60% of the GDP of the entire country.

  2. Wow, we need mobile clinics for Alabama and Red States transporting women to the North!
    How about controlling mens reproductive?

  3. God approves of Abortion…
    in fact he sanctions it for the crime of "infidelity"…
    don't believe me…
    read it for your self in the Bible, God's own book…
    – Numbers 5:11-31 New International Version (NIV)
    The Test for an Unfaithful Wife –
    11 Then the Lord said to Moses, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him 13 so that another man has sexual relations with her, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14 and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15 then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephah[a] of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy, a reminder-offering to draw attention to wrongdoing.

    16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

    “‘Then the woman is to say, “Amen. So be it.”

    23 “‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24 He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25 The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26 The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial[c] offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27 If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.

    29 “‘This, then, is the law of jealousy when a woman goes astray and makes herself impure while married to her husband, 30 or when feelings of jealousy come over a man because he suspects his wife. The priest is to have her stand before the Lord and is to apply this entire law to her. 31 The husband will be innocent of any wrongdoing, but the woman will bear the consequences of her sin.’”

  4. Republicans cry about the right to life for the fetus and scream "murder".

    if that is true then they have 0 concern for the "assault" known as birth or the "endentured servitude" known as raising a child.

    Who here is selfish enough to be okay forcing their mom to all these things she didnt want?

  5. dont worry about it libs the other planned parenthood clinics will work a little overtime to keep the infant death rate and marketing baby parts up.

  6. do you have a right to end someone's heartbeat? is heartbeat/brainwave activity used to determine point of death?
    heartbeat/brainwave activity should also be the point when life begins (DUH)
    mother's don't have the right to end the heartbeat of born or unborn children.. EVER
    how sick are you? (life in danger? you wouldn't give your life in exchange for your child to live?.. then you should be sterilized, never allowed to be a parent)

  7. NOTE: they have no opposing point of view.. BOTH guests are pro abortion. MSNBC is promoting murder, same as Netflix. (boycott them)
    Usually news has the pro and con argument.. this fake news show is 100% biased and used to promote murder.

  8. I can't believe they are closing those concentration camps… Oops I mean women's health facilities.

  9. Its funny you are all calling baby murder a human right, when it was your parents who chose to love you and raise you, you spit on future humans

  10. By toxic he may have meant ashtonbooby needed a doucheAbortion
            👤
        ✂️
      🤯
    Clinics
    Totally legit Healthcare

  11. Fun fact for msnbc watchers.
    Since 1973, 65 million unborn children have been aborted. Majority of which in African American communities.

    In Virginia, the democrat congressman who is pictured in blackface, a pediatric doctor btw, has a radio interview describing the new controversial third trimester abortion laws. In the interview, he says “in some cases, the child will be born and moved to a separate room, and kept comfortable, then a conversation can take place with the mother as to what should be done”. Look it up, the video is on YouTube of a child doctor talking casually about a baby already born being aborted.
    Not a heartbeat, but a fully formed human child after birth being killed. That is eugenics/infanticide being casually talked about on a public forum by a democrat congressman, a doctor specializing in children, within general a state where 1/5 people are black.

    You really think democrats care about you?

  12. all that has to happen to change everything is for women , et al,…whith hold pu$$y for a month! things will change!!!!

  13. The rural America will get poorer and stupider because all these teenage pregnency babies born into poverty and low education. The POOR AND STUPID is the bedrock of Republican base. I think States should have the power to leave the United States and form their own highly autonomous government. Each State ALREADY has so much power to make their extreme laws regarding abortion, guns, religion, healthcare, THE MOST IMPORTANT aspect of people's life, why do we have to be binded with stupid?!

  14. Im not upset about the new laws, because they were allowing very late abortions which is just barbaric!! That is how that one guy killed babies that were born alive and didnt get caught until someone died! I would say up to 12 weeks though, but keep birth control! Dont be stupid! And the ru486 pill

  15. Lets just cause stress and anxiety to more Americans.Women will be running out to be steralized,that is there choice not the state or government.If they are making women have children they don't want there will be much more child abuse.They should give each women 50,000 a year to raise a child she does not want.But no instead Trump and his croonies,cheats,rich folk in office are taking away insurance and support for the children who need it most.

  16. abortion — schmortion
    forget about it !
    Let’s talk about the Lakers
    oops, we’re back to abortion.

  17. The central thrust of Roe v. Wade is this: Women have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. Fetuses, prior to viability, do not have rights.The woman's decision to have an abortion takes precedence over the interests of the fetus.

    The specific right of a woman to make the decision to terminate her own pregnancy is generally classified as a privacy right implicit in the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments, but there are other constitutional reasons why a woman has the right to terminate her pregnancy. The Fourth Amendment, for example, specifies that citizens have "the right to be secure in their persons";

     The Thirteenth specifies that "{n}either slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist in the United States."

     Even if the privacy right cited in Roe v. Wade were dismissed, there are numerous other constitutional arguments that imply a woman's right to make decisions about her own reproductive process. Women have the power to exercise that right regardless of government policy.

  18. A fetus is a person but a baby doesn’t deserve health care and a toddler doesn’t deserve to not be locked in a cage and a child doesn’t deserve to not be shot at in school and an adult doesn’t deserve a living wage or a life with basic dignity.

    – The Republican philosophy

  19. "War on women" stop editorializing. Nobody calls themselves that. The pro life movement seeks to end violence against unborn babies or atleast government supported violence of the unborn. You can argue that it is a bad tactic and not helpful however, that title is simply your own personal opinion. 0 percent journalism and just makes you look bad. It'd be like calling the BLM the "war on police" because they wanted to end uncalled police violence against blacks. People also argued they did stuff the wrong way but that's not the point. MSNBC would never call the BLM the war on police even though several members literally took arms and killed police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge. I get that the BLM didn't endorse that but my point is still valid.

  20. The abortion issue is multi-faceted. Women of older WW2 generations related stories of risky abortions where young women bled to death, after having an illegal abortion; so many of that generation saw legal abortion as the solution for women. Women of the baby boom generation saw abortion as another birth control method; which reduced the standard of human rights. In 2019 women and all mankind should resolve our conflicts over abortion with a higher standard for human life. Women should not have their lives threatened by risky medical procedures by unlicensed persons nor should women use abortions as a birth control method. If the unborn child had human rights awarded to the developing fetus; then women and medical personnel would have to respect the legal status of the developing fetus child. The schools of early education should teach girls and young women the consequences of having an abortion can affect their ability to have future pregnancies; instead of giving them minimal information on abortion. The classified militaries have stated that their global control military units go into abortion clinics in order to take the aborted babies and resuscitate them; and then raise those babies to later victimize their abortion mothers. Women of all the nations, should know this information, so they can live their lives intelligently and make better decisions for themselves. By knowing that the international classified militaries actually work for the global elite matrix and are assaulting the family unit; and are removing children from mothers and fathers in every conceivable way that they can get away with. All nations should take back their own governments, freedoms, rights and government monies from these global elite matrix bankers, technocrats and their enforcers, the international classified militaries. These dystopian elite organizations want to reduce the world human populations by closing out the human family, making everyone a single person who only listen to and communicate at ELF frequency to an AI computer, one world order elite matrix; and having humans born only in experimentation laboratories. This kind of dystopian world should be ended, immediately. And moral governments of freedoms and rights for every individual human being living in the nations restored to all the nations of the world. All aborted, miscarried and still born babies are ascended back into the heavenly realm to live spiritual lives. God has given mankind Two Witness books to discipline their human minds to be good, noble human beings. Those Two Witness books are the KJV Holy Bible, 1611 and Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by MBE, 1875. St John has written of God's Two Witness books in Revelation 11: 3. Mrs. Eddy foresaw that divine Science explained in Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, 1875 would be taught in schools of higher education in the future. Mrs. Eddy foresaw the last days of mankind on the earth as a change in the seasons and disruptions in our normal routines. In my book, St John's New Heaven and New Earth, I have theorized that God's angels will purify of all mankind; and then all mankind will ascend into heaven to live with God and Christ Jesus, forever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *