Trump SCOTUS Nominee’s Record On Presidential Investigations And Abortion | The Last Word | MSNBC


>>AS SOMEONE NEITHER A LAWYER AND TRIES NOT TO PLAY ONE ON TV, AND TRIES NOT TO PLAY ONE ON TV, I’M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. I’M GLAD TO HEAR THAT.>>TONIGHT, AS PREDICTED AND AS>>TONIGHT, AS PREDICTED AND AS ANNOUNCED BY MBCNBC NEWS, PRESID ANNOUNCED BY MBCNBC NEWS, PRESID TRUMP NOMINATED FOR THE UNITED TRUMP NOMINATED FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT A FEDERAL STATES SUPREME COURT A FEDERAL APPEALS COURT JUDGE, JUDGE BRETT APPEALS COURT JUDGE, JUDGE BRETT CAVANAUGH, WHO HAS WRITTEN IN CAVANAUGH, WHO HAS WRITTEN IN DETAIL THAT HE BELIEVES THAT DETAIL THAT HE BELIEVES THAT PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS. INVESTIGATIONS. JUDGE CAVANAUGH WAS A STAFF JUDGE CAVANAUGH WAS A STAFF LAWYER IN THE OFFICE OF KENNETH LAWYER IN THE OFFICE OF KENNETH STARR WHOSE INVESTIGATION OF STARR WHOSE INVESTIGATION OF BILL CLINTON LED TO THE I BILL CLINTON LED TO THE I ACQUITTAL OF PRESIDENT CLIN TOLL ACQUITTAL OF PRESIDENT CLIN TOLL HE SUGGESTED IT IS CURRENTLY HE SUGGESTED IT IS CURRENTLY POSSIBLE FOR A SITTING PRESIDENT POSSIBLE FOR A SITTING PRESIDENT TO BE INDICTED AND THAT CONGRESS TO BE INDICTED AND THAT CONGRESS SHOULD TAKE ACTION TO PREVENT SHOULD TAKE ACTION TO PREVENT PRESIDENTS FROM BEING SUBJECTED PRESIDENTS FROM BEING SUBJECTED TO CIVIL LAWSUITS OR CRIMINAL TO CIVIL LAWSUITS OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS DURING THEIR TIME PROSECUTIONS DURING THEIR TIME AS PRESIDENT. AS PRESIDENT. JUDGE CAVANAUGH SAID THAT AFTER JUDGE CAVANAUGH SAID THAT AFTER WORKING IN GEORGE W. BUSH’S WORKING IN GEORGE W. BUSH’S WHITE HOUSE, HE CHANGED HIS MIND WHITE HOUSE, HE CHANGED HIS MIND ABOUT THE LEGAL LIABILITIES THAT ABOUT THE LEGAL LIABILITIES THAT A PRESIDENT SHOULD FACE. A PRESIDENT SHOULD FACE. THE MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW HE THE MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW HE WROTE, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE WROTE, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR CONGRESS TO ENACT A STATUTE FOR CONGRESS TO ENACT A STATUTE PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSONAL PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSONAL CIVIL SUITS AGAINST PRESIDENTS CIVIL SUITS AGAINST PRESIDENTS LIKE CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE LIKE CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY, BE DEFERRED WHILE THE MILITARY, BE DEFERRED WHILE THE PRESIDENT IS IN OFFICE. PRESIDENT IS IN OFFICE. CONGRESS SHOULD CONSIDER DOING CONGRESS SHOULD CONSIDER DOING THE SAME, MOREOVER, WITH RESPECT THE SAME, MOREOVER, WITH RESPECT TO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND TO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT. PROSECUTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT. IN PARTICULAR, CONGRESS MIGHT IN PARTICULAR, CONGRESS MIGHT CONSIDER A LAW EXEMPTING A CONSIDER A LAW EXEMPTING A PRESIDENT WHILE IN OFFICE FROM PRESIDENT WHILE IN OFFICE FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING FROM INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING FROM QUESTIONING MY PROSECUTORS OR QUESTIONING MY PROSECUTORS OR DEFENSE COUNSEL. DEFENSE COUNSEL. HERE IS THE PASSAGE THAT HERE IS THE PASSAGE THAT INDICATES THAT JUDGE CAVANAUGH INDICATES THAT JUDGE CAVANAUGH CURRENTLY BELIEVES THAT A CURRENTLY BELIEVES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CAN BE SITTING PRESIDENT CAN BE INDICTED AND CAN BE PUT ON TRIAL INDICTED AND CAN BE PUT ON TRIAL WHILE PRESIDENT. WHILE PRESIDENT. JUDGE CAVANAUGH WROTE, QUOTE, JUDGE CAVANAUGH WROTE, QUOTE, THE INDICTMENT AND TRIAL OF A THE INDICTMENT AND TRIAL OF A SITTING PRESIDENT, MOREOVER, SITTING PRESIDENT, MOREOVER, WOULD CRIPPLE THE FEDERAL WOULD CRIPPLE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, RENDERING IT UNABLE GOVERNMENT, RENDERING IT UNABLE TO FUNCTION WITH CREDIBILITY IN TO FUNCTION WITH CREDIBILITY IN EITHER THE INTERNATIONAL OR EITHER THE INTERNATIONAL OR DOMESTIC ARENAS. DOMESTIC ARENAS. IT WOULD ILL SERVE THE PUBLIC IT WOULD ILL SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST, ESPECIALLY IN TIMES OF INTEREST, ESPECIALLY IN TIMES OF FINANCIAL OR NATIONAL SECURITY FINANCIAL OR NATIONAL SECURITY CRISIS. CRISIS. JUDGE CAVANAUGH DID NOT WRITE JUDGE CAVANAUGH DID NOT WRITE THAT THE INDICTMENT AND TRIAL OF THAT THE INDICTMENT AND TRIAL OF A SITTING PRESIDENT IS A SITTING PRESIDENT IS PROHIBITED BY THE CONSTITUTION. PROHIBITED BY THE CONSTITUTION. JUDGE CAVANAUGH’S ARTICLE SEEMS JUDGE CAVANAUGH’S ARTICLE SEEMS TO PRESUME, AS A CONSTITUTIONAL TO PRESUME, AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER, THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN MATTER, THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN BE INDICTED AND CAN BE PUT ON BE INDICTED AND CAN BE PUT ON TRIAL IN A CRIMINAL COURT UNLESS TRIAL IN A CRIMINAL COURT UNLESS CONGRESS SPECIFICALLY PASSES A CONGRESS SPECIFICALLY PASSES A BILL THAT PREVENTS THAT. BILL THAT PREVENTS THAT. JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW IS JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW IS THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF PLANNED THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE AUTHOR OF PARENTHOOD AND THE AUTHOR OF MAKE TROUBLE STANDING UP, MAKE TROUBLE STANDING UP, SPEAKING OUT AND FINDING THE SPEAKING OUT AND FINDING THE COURAGE TO LEAD. COURAGE TO LEAD. ALSO JOINING US A FORMER SENIOR ALSO JOINING US A FORMER SENIOR AGENT TO PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE AGENT TO PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE CENTER FOR PRESIDENT OF THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS. AMERICAN PROGRESS. AND YOU HAVE BEEN AT THE SUPREME AND YOU HAVE BEEN AT THE SUPREME COURT TONIGHT WHERE THERE HAS COURT TONIGHT WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A PUBLIC PROTEST REACTION BEEN A PUBLIC PROTEST REACTION THERE TO THIS NOMINEE. THERE TO THIS NOMINEE. WHAT IS HAPPENING THERE NOW? WHAT IS HAPPENING THERE NOW?>>LAWRENCE, I HAVE BEEN HERE>>LAWRENCE, I HAVE BEEN HERE SINCE REALLY THE ANNOUNCEMENT. SINCE REALLY THE ANNOUNCEMENT. AND WE HAVE A GROWING CROWD. AND WE HAVE A GROWING CROWD. I THINK IT IS NOW OVER 1,000 I THINK IT IS NOW OVER 1,000 PEOPLE WHO ARE DEEPLY CONCERNED PEOPLE WHO ARE DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT BRETT KAVANAUGH AND WHAT ABOUT BRETT KAVANAUGH AND WHAT HE WILL DO FOR AMERICANS RIGHTS. HE WILL DO FOR AMERICANS RIGHTS. THE NOMINATION REALLY IS A THE NOMINATION REALLY IS A THREAT TO ALL OF OUR RIGHTS. THREAT TO ALL OF OUR RIGHTS.>>EVERYONE HAS BEEN CONCERNED>>EVERYONE HAS BEEN CONCERNED FOR WHAT ANY TRUMP NOMINEE WOULD FOR WHAT ANY TRUMP NOMINEE WOULD MEAN TO ROWE V. WADE AND NBC MEAN TO ROWE V. WADE AND NBC NEWS IS REPORTING THAT LAST CALL NEWS IS REPORTING THAT LAST CALL JUDGE KAVANAUGH CRITICIZED HIS JUDGE KAVANAUGH CRITICIZED HIS COLLEAGUES ON THE COURT FOR COLLEAGUES ON THE COURT FOR CREATING A NEW RIGHT FOR CREATING A NEW RIGHT FOR UNLAWFUL IMMIGRANT MINORS IN UNLAWFUL IMMIGRANT MINORS IN U.S. GOVERNMENT DETENTION TO U.S. GOVERNMENT DETENTION TO OBTAIN ABORTION ON DEMAND. OBTAIN ABORTION ON DEMAND.>>I MEAN, IT WAS INCREDIBLE>>I MEAN, IT WAS INCREDIBLE CASE AND SHE WAS OF COURSE JUST CASE AND SHE WAS OF COURSE JUST TRYING TO EXERCISE HER LEGAL TRYING TO EXERCISE HER LEGAL RIGHT AND, IN FACT, IF HE HAD RIGHT AND, IN FACT, IF HE HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL, HE WOULD HAVE PUSHED HER ACTUALLY INTO HER PUSHED HER ACTUALLY INTO HER SECOND TRIMESTER. SECOND TRIMESTER. I THINK THAT THIS NOMINATION IS I THINK THAT THIS NOMINATION IS CAUSING CONCERN, OBVIOUSLY, FOR CAUSING CONCERN, OBVIOUSLY, FOR WOMEN ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY. WOMEN ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY. IT HAS BEEN THE LAW OF THE LAND IT HAS BEEN THE LAW OF THE LAND FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS, BUT WE FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS, BUT WE KNOW IT’S BEEN HANGING WITH A KNOW IT’S BEEN HANGING WITH A ONE VOTE DIFFERENCE OF THE ONE VOTE DIFFERENCE OF THE COURT. COURT. I THINK WOMEN WHO ARE ALREADY I THINK WOMEN WHO ARE ALREADY WILDLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS WILDLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PRESIDENT AND EVERYTHING HE’S PRESIDENT AND EVERYTHING HE’S DONE ARE GOING TO BE DEEPLY DONE ARE GOING TO BE DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS NOMINATION. CONCERNED ABOUT THIS NOMINATION. I THINK WHAT YOU ARE SEEING IS I THINK WHAT YOU ARE SEEING IS JUST ONE INDICATION. JUST ONE INDICATION.>>I WANT TO GET YOUR REACTION>>I WANT TO GET YOUR REACTION TO THIS PASSAGE IN HIS 2009 TO THIS PASSAGE IN HIS 2009 WRITING WHERE HE SAYS — HE WRITING WHERE HE SAYS — HE TALKS ABOUT WHAT THE INDICTMENT TALKS ABOUT WHAT THE INDICTMENT AND TRIAL OF A SITTING PRESIDENT AND TRIAL OF A SITTING PRESIDENT WOULD MEAN. WOULD MEAN. SO THIS MEANS THAT JUDGE SO THIS MEANS THAT JUDGE KAVANAUGH WOULD BE — IF HE KAVANAUGH WOULD BE — IF HE FINDS HIMSELF IN A POSITION FINDS HIMSELF IN A POSITION WHERE HE CAN RULE AS A SUPREME WHERE HE CAN RULE AS A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE THAT IT IS COURT JUSTICE THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO INDICT A UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT, HE WOULD BE SITTING PRESIDENT, HE WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH JUDGE IN CONFLICT WITH JUDGE KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH.>>HE WOULD, BUT THIS ARTICLE>>HE WOULD, BUT THIS ARTICLE WHICH LARGELY SAYS THAT CONGRESS WHICH LARGELY SAYS THAT CONGRESS SHOULD FIND A WAY TO EXEMPT THE SHOULD FIND A WAY TO EXEMPT THE PRESIDENT FROM EVEN BEING PRESIDENT FROM EVEN BEING QUESTIONED CLEARLY WAS EYE CANDY QUESTIONED CLEARLY WAS EYE CANDY FOR DONALD TRUMP AND SAID HE FOR DONALD TRUMP AND SAID HE WOULD BE SIMPATICO WITH HIS WOULD BE SIMPATICO WITH HIS POSITION. POSITION. I AGREE. I AGREE. IF HE FLIPS ALL THE WAY OVER AND IF HE FLIPS ALL THE WAY OVER AND SAYS TRUMP IN FACT LEGALLY IS SAYS TRUMP IN FACT LEGALLY IS PROTECTED, THAT WOULD BE A PROTECTED, THAT WOULD BE A CHANGE IN POSITION. CHANGE IN POSITION. BUT I THINK THAT’S WHY QUESTION BUT I THINK THAT’S WHY QUESTION NUMBER ONE SHOULD BE, WHAT WERE NUMBER ONE SHOULD BE, WHAT WERE YOU ASKED ABOUT THIS ARTICLE? YOU ASKED ABOUT THIS ARTICLE? WHAT DID YOU SAY? WHAT DID YOU SAY? WHAT ASSURANCES DID YOU OFFER? WHAT ASSURANCES DID YOU OFFER? WHAT KINDS OF THINGS DID THE WHAT KINDS OF THINGS DID THE WHITE HOUSE WANT TO KNOW? WHITE HOUSE WANT TO KNOW? HE IS THE ONLY POTENTIAL NOMINEE HE IS THE ONLY POTENTIAL NOMINEE ON TRUMP’S LIST WHO EXPLICITLY ON TRUMP’S LIST WHO EXPLICITLY WROTE THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE WROTE THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE PROTECTION FROM INVESTIGATIONS. PROTECTION FROM INVESTIGATIONS. THAT DEFINITELY HAD TO RAISE THAT DEFINITELY HAD TO RAISE QUESTIONS IN THE PROCESS. QUESTIONS IN THE PROCESS.>>BUT THAT MEANS HE’S ALSO THE>>BUT THAT MEANS HE’S ALSO THE ONLY ONE WHO SPECIFICALLY WROTE ONLY ONE WHO SPECIFICALLY WROTE THAT ONLY CONGRESS CAN PROVIDE THAT ONLY CONGRESS CAN PROVIDE THOSE PROTECTIONS. THOSE PROTECTIONS. THE SUPREME COURT CANNOT. THE SUPREME COURT CANNOT.>>LOOK, I THINK CLEARLY WHAT>>LOOK, I THINK CLEARLY WHAT THIS MEANS FOR DONALD TRUMP IS THIS MEANS FOR DONALD TRUMP IS ONE QUESTION. ONE QUESTION. WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE OTHER WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE OTHER THREE HUNDRED MILLION OF US IS THREE HUNDRED MILLION OF US IS ANOTHER QUESTION. ANOTHER QUESTION. HE DISSENTED FROM THE CASE THAT HE DISSENTED FROM THE CASE THAT UPHELD THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT UPHELD THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT OF THE RIGHT OF EMPLOYEES TO GET OF THE RIGHT OF EMPLOYEES TO GET BIRTH CONTROL. BIRTH CONTROL. HE WOULD GIVE WOMEN’S RIGHTS HE WOULD GIVE WOMEN’S RIGHTS OVER TO THEIR EMPLOYERS. OVER TO THEIR EMPLOYERS. HE IS A VERY, VERY CONSERVATIVE HE IS A VERY, VERY CONSERVATIVE JUDGE. JUDGE. THAT’S WHY HE WAS HIT. THAT’S WHY HE WAS HIT. THAT IS THE ISSUE FRONT AND THAT IS THE ISSUE FRONT AND CENTER AS WELL. CENTER AS WELL.>>WHEN HE WAS CONFIRMED, HE GOT>>WHEN HE WAS CONFIRMED, HE GOT FOUR DEMOCRATIC VOTES. FOUR DEMOCRATIC VOTES. ONLY ONE OF THOSE SENATORS IS ONLY ONE OF THOSE SENATORS IS STILL IN THE SENATE. STILL IN THE SENATE. THAT’S SENATOR CARPER. THAT’S SENATOR CARPER. YOU ARE HEARING FROM SENATORS YOU ARE HEARING FROM SENATORS THERE TONIGHT. THERE TONIGHT. DOES IT SOUND LIKE THERE WILL BE DOES IT SOUND LIKE THERE WILL BE ANY DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT FOR THIS ANY DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT FOR THIS NOMINEE? NOMINEE?>>FROM THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS>>FROM THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT, ALL WE’RE WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT, ALL WE’RE HEARING IS ABOUT A PROTECTION OF HEARING IS ABOUT A PROTECTION OF AMERICAN’S RIGHTS. AMERICAN’S RIGHTS. WE SHOULD BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS, WE SHOULD BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS, THAT THIS IS A NOMINEE WHO THAT THIS IS A NOMINEE WHO THREATENS ROWE, A NOMINEE WHO THREATENS ROWE, A NOMINEE WHO THREATENS THE HEALTH CARE OF THREATENS THE HEALTH CARE OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AND A NOMINEE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AND A NOMINEE WHO HAS SPOKEN ABOUT THE WHO HAS SPOKEN ABOUT THE PROTECTIONS A PRESIDENTS SHOULD PROTECTIONS A PRESIDENTS SHOULD HAVE FROM INVESTIGATION. HAVE FROM INVESTIGATION. IT’S UNCLEAR WHERE HE WOULD LAND IT’S UNCLEAR WHERE HE WOULD LAND UP ON THAT, BUT HE HAS SPOKEN UP ON THAT, BUT HE HAS SPOKEN MORE CLEARLY ABOUT THE NEED FOR MORE CLEARLY ABOUT THE NEED FOR A PRESIDENT NOT TO BE INDICTED A PRESIDENT NOT TO BE INDICTED THAN ANY OTHER NOMINEE. THAN ANY OTHER NOMINEE. AND I THINK AMERICANS SHOULD BE AND I THINK AMERICANS SHOULD BE SUSPICIOUS. SUSPICIOUS. THE SENATORS HERE TONIGHT ARE THE SENATORS HERE TONIGHT ARE WILLING TO STAND UP AND FIGHT WILLING TO STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR THE ISSUES WE ALL CARE FOR THE ISSUES WE ALL CARE ABOUT, BUT WE HAVE TO REMEMBER ABOUT, BUT WE HAVE TO REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS WHO HAVE CLAIMED TO REPUBLICANS WHO HAVE CLAIMED TO BE PRO-CHOICE NOMINEES. BE PRO-CHOICE NOMINEES. BRETT KAVANAUGH HAS GONE OUT OF BRETT KAVANAUGH HAS GONE OUT OF HIS WAY TO ARGUE THE DISSENT HIS WAY TO ARGUE THE DISSENT SIDE IN ROWE. SIDE IN ROWE. SO I THINK WEHE HAS TO STATE SO I THINK WEHE HAS TO STATE WHETHER IT SHOULD BE THE LAW OF WHETHER IT SHOULD BE THE LAW OF THE LAND. THE LAND. ONLY THEN CAN WE REALLY ONLY THEN CAN WE REALLY DETERMINE HIS ACTUAL VIEWS. DETERMINE HIS ACTUAL VIEWS.>>SUE RICHARDS, ONE OF THE>>SUE RICHARDS, ONE OF THE SENATORS THAT CAN STOP THIS NAM SENATORS THAT CAN STOP THIS NAM NATION NATION — NOMINATION RELEASED A — NOMINATION RELEASED A WRITTEN STATEMENT AND SHE SAYS I WRITTEN STATEMENT AND SHE SAYS I INTEND TO CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INTEND TO CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION’S AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION’S RATING ON THIS NOMINEE, THE RATING ON THIS NOMINEE, THE INFORMATION OBTAINED THROUGH INFORMATION OBTAINED THROUGH PERSONAL MEETINGS, MY OWN REVIEW PERSONAL MEETINGS, MY OWN REVIEW OF JUDGE KAVANAUGH’S OF JUDGE KAVANAUGH’S QUALIFICATION AND THE VIEW OF QUALIFICATION AND THE VIEW OF ALAS CANS IN DETERMINING WHETHER ALAS CANS IN DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT TO SUPPORT HIM. OR NOT TO SUPPORT HIM. IS THE BEST STRATEGY FOR IS THE BEST STRATEGY FOR OPPONENTS OF OUR NATION TO OPPONENTS OF OUR NATION TO LITERALLY GO TO ALASKA AND TRY LITERALLY GO TO ALASKA AND TRY TO STIMULATE THEIR OPPOSITION? TO STIMULATE THEIR OPPOSITION?>>I THINK THERE WILL BE.>>I THINK THERE WILL BE. HE WILL BE HEARING FROM A LOT OF HE WILL BE HEARING FROM A LOT OF PEOPLE IN ALASKA, A LOT OF PEOPLE IN ALASKA, A LOT OF WOMEN. WOMEN. I AM GLAD THEY DIDN’T GO TO THE I AM GLAD THEY DIDN’T GO TO THE WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT. WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT.>>THEY WERE INVITED.>>THEY WERE INVITED.>>THEY WERE INVITED.>>THEY WERE INVITED.>>IT WAS AN AUDIENCE OF>>IT WAS AN AUDIENCE OF SENATORS, AMONG OTHERS. SENATORS, AMONG OTHERS.>>AND I THINK IT IS REALLY>>AND I THINK IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT, OF COURSE, IMPORTANT THAT, OF COURSE, CONFIRMING THE NEXT SUPREME CONFIRMING THE NEXT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE HAS IMPLICATIONS COURT JUSTICE HAS IMPLICATIONS NOT ONLY FOR THE WOMEN OF ALASKA NOT ONLY FOR THE WOMEN OF ALASKA BUT FOR THE WOMAN ALL ACROSS BUT FOR THE WOMAN ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY. THIS COUNTRY. IT IS NOT ONLY WHAT HIS POSITION IT IS NOT ONLY WHAT HIS POSITION IS ON ROWE. IS ON ROWE. HE HAS TAKEN AN ACTIVE POSITION HE HAS TAKEN AN ACTIVE POSITION IN BELIEVING THAT BOSSES SHOULD IN BELIEVING THAT BOSSES SHOULD BE ABLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR BE ABLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEIR EMPLOYEES HAVE BIRTH NOT THEIR EMPLOYEES HAVE BIRTH CONTROL. CONTROL. WE KNOW THERE IS A BIG ACA CASE WE KNOW THERE IS A BIG ACA CASE WHICH IS BASICALLY PROTECTING WHICH IS BASICALLY PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN NOT ONLY TO THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN NOT ONLY TO GET FAMILY PLANNING, PROTECTING GET FAMILY PLANNING, PROTECTING FOLKS WITH PRE-EXISTING FOLKS WITH PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, PROTECTING WOMEN TO CONDITIONS, PROTECTING WOMEN TO NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR MORE HEALTH NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR MORE HEALTH INSURANCE THAN MEN. INSURANCE THAN MEN. EVERY SINGLE ACCESS TO HEALTH EVERY SINGLE ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE AND ECONOMIC ISSUES FOR CARE AND ECONOMIC ISSUES FOR WOMEN ARE ON THE LINE HERE AND I WOMEN ARE ON THE LINE HERE AND I CERTAINLY HOPE THEY FORCE HIM TO CERTAINLY HOPE THEY FORCE HIM TO SAY WHAT IS HIS POSITION ON ROWE SAY WHAT IS HIS POSITION ON ROWE V. WADE AND WOMEN’S EQUAL ACCESS V. WADE AND WOMEN’S EQUAL ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE. TO HEALTH CARE.>>NO ONE HAS BEEN THROUGH THE>>NO ONE HAS BEEN THROUGH THE CONFIRMATION MORE THAN YOU HAVE CONFIRMATION MORE THAN YOU HAVE AND THE SENATE JUDICIARY AND THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN THE CLINTON COMMITTEE IN THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, IN THE OBAMA NOMINATION. NOMINATION. YOU HAVE COACHED NOMINEES YOU HAVE COACHED NOMINEES SUCCESSFULLY. SUCCESSFULLY. STRATEGICALLY, WHAT CAN BE DONE STRATEGICALLY, WHAT CAN BE DONE FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO STOP THIS FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO STOP THIS NOMINATION? NOMINATION?>>WELL, FIRST THEY HAVE TO MAKE>>WELL, FIRST THEY HAVE TO MAKE SURE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SURE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE DOES IT JOB. DOES IT JOB. THAT STARTS WITH A THOROUGH THAT STARTS WITH A THOROUGH REVIEW OF HIS RECORDS, INCLUDING REVIEW OF HIS RECORDS, INCLUDING HIS YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE. HIS YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE. WHEN BRETT WAS NOMINATED FOR THE WHEN BRETT WAS NOMINATED FOR THE APPELLATE COURT AND APPROVED, APPELLATE COURT AND APPROVED, THEY DID NOT LOOK AT THE THEY DID NOT LOOK AT THE LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF MEMOS HE LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF MEMOS HE WROTE AS A SENIOR AID TO WROTE AS A SENIOR AID TO PRESIDENT BUSH. PRESIDENT BUSH. I THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR I THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE COMMITTEE, FOR THIS LIFE THE COMMITTEE, FOR THIS LIFE APPOINTMENT TO MAKE THESE APPOINTMENT TO MAKE THESE IMPORTANT DECISIONS FOR THEM TO IMPORTANT DECISIONS FOR THEM TO SEE THE FULL RECORD HERE. SEE THE FULL RECORD HERE. WHAT KIND OF MEMOS DID YOU WRITE WHAT KIND OF MEMOS DID YOU WRITE TO PRESIDENT BUSH? TO PRESIDENT BUSH? WHAT POSITIONS DID YOU TAKE ON WHAT POSITIONS DID YOU TAKE ON LEGAL ISSUES? LEGAL ISSUES? WHAT DO THE FOLKS WHO MADE THIS WHAT DO THE FOLKS WHO MADE THIS PICK KNOW THAT WE DON’T KNOW. PICK KNOW THAT WE DON’T KNOW. THE FEDERAL SOCIETY PUT HIM ON THE FEDERAL SOCIETY PUT HIM ON THIS LIST, APPOINTED HIM. THIS LIST, APPOINTED HIM. THEY KNOW WHO HE DID AS A BUSH THEY KNOW WHO HE DID AS A BUSH AID. AID. WE DON’T. WE DON’T. THE PUBLIC AND JUDICIARY THE PUBLIC AND JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME COMMITTEE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RIGHT TO THAT INFORMATION. RIGHT TO THAT INFORMATION.>>THE OPPONENTS OF THIS>>THE OPPONENTS OF THIS NOMINATION WHO HAVE GATHERED AT NOMINATION WHO HAVE GATHERED AT THE SUPREME COURT TONIGHT, IS THE SUPREME COURT TONIGHT, IS THEIR FOCUS ON REPUBLICAN THEIR FOCUS ON REPUBLICAN SENATORS TONIGHT, LIKE SUZANNE SENATORS TONIGHT, LIKE SUZANNE COLLINS OR LISA MERKUWSKI? COLLINS OR LISA MERKUWSKI?>>I THINK THEY’RE FOCUSSED ON A>>I THINK THEY’RE FOCUSSED ON A MAJORITY IN THE SENATE, WHICH MAJORITY IN THE SENATE, WHICH MEANS WE NEED DEMOCRATS TO MEANS WE NEED DEMOCRATS TO OPPOSE THIS NOMINATION. OPPOSE THIS NOMINATION. BUT WE CAN’T DO THIS WITH BUT WE CAN’T DO THIS WITH DEMOCRATS ALONE. DEMOCRATS ALONE. THEY COULD BE IN OFFICE WHEN A THEY COULD BE IN OFFICE WHEN A BRETT KAVANAUGH DECIDES WITH THE BRETT KAVANAUGH DECIDES WITH THE MAJORITY TO OVERTURN ROWE OR TO MAJORITY TO OVERTURN ROWE OR TO GUT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. GUT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. THIS IS A DECISION THEY MAKE THIS IS A DECISION THEY MAKE WITH MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ON WITH MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ON THEIR SHOULDER. THEIR SHOULDER. THE PEOPLE ON THESE STREETS THE PEOPLE ON THESE STREETS HERE, THE PEOPLE ON THIS RALLY HERE, THE PEOPLE ON THIS RALLY ARE FOCUSSED ON MAKING THEIR ARE FOCUSSED ON MAKING THEIR VOICES HEARD. VOICES HEARD. IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT FOR ALL IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT FOR ALL OF US TO CALL OUR SENATORS. OF US TO CALL OUR SENATORS. THIS IS ADVISE AN CONSENT IN THE THIS IS ADVISE AN CONSENT IN THE SENATE TO CALL OUR SENATORS AND SENATE TO CALL OUR SENATORS AND LET THEM KNOW THIS NOMINATION IS LET THEM KNOW THIS NOMINATION IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE AGREE WITH NOT SOMETHING THAT WE AGREE WITH AS AMERICANS, THAT OUR RIGHTS AS AMERICANS, THAT OUR RIGHTS SHOULD NOT BE UP TO DONALD TRUMP SHOULD NOT BE UP TO DONALD TRUMP AND TRUMP COURT. AND TRUMP COURT.>>IF JUDGE KAVANAUGH IS>>IF JUDGE KAVANAUGH IS CONFIRMED AND IF HE VOTES TO CONFIRMED AND IF HE VOTES TO OVERTURN ROWE V. WADE, IT WOULD OVERTURN ROWE V. WADE, IT WOULD BE OVER TURNED BY FIVE MEN BE OVER TURNED BY FIVE MEN WITHOUT A WOMAN’S VOTE. WITHOUT A WOMAN’S VOTE.>>THIS IS A VERY REAL, REAL>>THIS IS A VERY REAL, REAL POSSIBILITY. POSSIBILITY. THIS ISN’T — WE ARE NOT PLAYING THIS ISN’T — WE ARE NOT PLAYING AROUND. AROUND. ONE OF THE THINGS TO LOOK AT IS ONE OF THE THINGS TO LOOK AT IS NOT ONLY WHO WE’RE SEEING IN NOT ONLY WHO WE’RE SEEING IN OPPOSITION TO THIS NOMINATION, OPPOSITION TO THIS NOMINATION, BUT I NOTICE BEFORE I CAME ON BUT I NOTICE BEFORE I CAME ON TONIGHT, LAWRENCE, THAT EVERY TONIGHT, LAWRENCE, THAT EVERY MAJOR NATIONAL ANTI-CHOICE MAJOR NATIONAL ANTI-CHOICE ORGANIZATION IS POPPING THE ORGANIZATION IS POPPING THE CHAMPAGNE TONIGHT SAYING THIS IS CHAMPAGNE TONIGHT SAYING THIS IS A HUGE VICTORY. A HUGE VICTORY. FINALLY TO GET AN ANTI-CHOICE FINALLY TO GET AN ANTI-CHOICE MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT. MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT. SO I THINK IT IS GOING TO BE SO I THINK IT IS GOING TO BE INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT IN THESE INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT IN THESE HEARINGS TO PUSH THIS JUDGE HEARINGS TO PUSH THIS JUDGE ABOUT WHERE HE STANDS ON A CASE ABOUT WHERE HE STANDS ON A CASE THAT WAS DECIDED 45 YEARS AGO. THAT WAS DECIDED 45 YEARS AGO.>>RON, WHERE DO YOU EXPECT MOST>>RON, WHERE DO YOU EXPECT MOST OF THE EMPHASIS TO BE IN THE OF THE EMPHASIS TO BE IN THE CONFIRMATION HEARING? CONFIRMATION HEARING? THERE IS OBVIOUSLY TWO BIG THERE IS OBVIOUSLY TWO BIG AREAS, ONE IS ROWE V. WADE. AREAS, ONE IS ROWE V. WADE. THE OTHER IS THE POSSIBLE THE OTHER IS THE POSSIBLE AVENUES OF CHALLENGE OF THE AVENUES OF CHALLENGE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BOTH THROUGH SPECIAL PROS CUEKU BOTH THROUGH SPECIAL PROS CUEKU PROSECUTORS. PROSECUTORS.>>I THINK THAT’S RIGHT.>>I THINK THAT’S RIGHT. I’D ADD TWO MORE. I’D ADD TWO MORE. ONE IS THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ONE IS THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND WHAT JUDGE KAVANAUGH SAID AND WHAT JUDGE KAVANAUGH SAID ABOUT THAT. ABOUT THAT. YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SENATOR YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SENATOR WARREN ON SOON. WARREN ON SOON. JUDGE SAID IT WAS ENVIRONMENTAL. JUDGE SAID IT WAS ENVIRONMENTAL. IT IS A FOURTH ELEMENT OF HIS IT IS A FOURTH ELEMENT OF HIS CONFIRMATION I EXPECT DEMOCRATS CONFIRMATION I EXPECT DEMOCRATS TO HAVE VERY HARD QUESTIONS TO HAVE VERY HARD QUESTIONS ABOUT. ABOUT.>>I AM TAKING NOTES ON MY>>I AM TAKING NOTES ON MY QUESTIONS FOR SENATOR WARREN WHO

100 Replies to “Trump SCOTUS Nominee’s Record On Presidential Investigations And Abortion | The Last Word | MSNBC”

  1. another conservative hypocrite. trump payed for many abortions. cheater, pedophile, pervert, bigot. these trumpanzys are the antichrist demons.

  2. Wrong, you guys haven’t read the constitution you can’t indite a sitting president without evidence. And there is no evidence! can y’all not get that through your thick numbskulls?

  3. the republicans and evangelical must have forgotten if you overturn Roe vs Wade that just doesn't affect white women but all women(minorities) meaning all those little black and brown babies are going to not be aborted and 2030 is creeping up on you and that doesn't help M.A.W.A you didn't think about that did you ?.

  4. Maybe if the Republican Party is under investigation, this Supreme Court nominee will be null and void?

  5. No abortion means more black and brown babies. Speeding up the Latin majority in u.s. Bad math not just stereotype?

  6. its interesting how little concern is given to the life of the unborn. Like in the case of the immigrant girl. They never seem to care that a person was killed.

  7. This is not just a fight over a woman's right to choose. It's a fight over the Affordable Health Care Act which was also ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court. It's a fight over workers rights and financial and environmental protections. And, it's a fight against abuse of power at the very heart of our democracy. If Cavanaugh is being nominated to overturn precedence, everyone's rights are at risk.

    How does it make sense not to do an investigation as soon as possible to protect the evidence? The Grand Jury named Richard Nixon an un-indicted co-conspirator to get his tapes and the Congressional Judiciary filed the case in federal court. When it got to the Supreme Court, the Court ruled that A PRESIDENT IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW
    (United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) .. Page 418 U. S. 715 )

    The Gtand Jury named Richard Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in U.S. v Nixon ad the Supreme Court ruled that a president is not above the law. That would indicate that a president CAN be indicted not just named as an un-indicted suspect. If a president can be indicted or, even named as an un-indicted co-conspirator, he should be subject to a subpoena. To judge otherwise would seem to require the reversal o U.S. v Nixon.

    And, it sounds like first step is already in place to turn reproduction rights to the state (or corporations).

  8. What's everybody worried about? Kavanaugh was picked by a criminal, is being supported by a Cover-up Congress and is Putin  approved…..what could go wrong for freedom and democracy in the USA?

  9. Let me get this straight. A left wing candidate wins the popular vote for president but the office is handed to her far-right opposition candidate who came in second. He (Trump) then goes on to pack the court in his favor. This is democracy? They have a better system in Mexico!

  10. So like the president said when running for president he could shot anyone he liked and not be held accountable, what a piece of crap this’s new Supreme Court justice is!!!! Let’s stand up against this presidency and block this nomination!!!!

  11. Re a woman’s right to choose, let us not forget that Prez Dennison is on record saying the “woman” must be punished ( for aborting) …and he promised to stack the court to overturn RVW…Kavanaugh is Gorsuch on opioids…

  12. I feel bad for the good people of the USA not the subhuman trash who are supporting these monsters who solidify the swamp coalition that is the new Republican party, doesn't look like you'll get out of this one.

  13. Congress should never pass a bill that a sitting President can not be Indited . No one is above the Law !

  14. idk, sounds like a bunch of b.s.; i need to see more info on someone before i go all nut job like some in the video, which i saw they were ready to protest any one who was picked…that doesn't sound normal

  15. Rome is on Fire. History repeats itself.
    We all know those republican women are going to fold and probably Joe manchin as well.
    No faith in this government left.

  16. Don't forget Americans, Hillary (whatever you think of her) won the Presidency. The Electoral College was stolen through Interstate Crosscheck. It was a coup and it's not the first time Republicans have stolen an election.

  17. Sorry Mr. Mueller .. I know you and the team are investigating a deep, far-reaching web of conspiracy, espionage and deceit. My question? Can you go after the Big Fish before this Scotus nominee gets on the bench?
    Think Trump and Putin will seal agreement to lift sanctions on Russia in exchange for fixing the Midterm elections for Trump and his limp, traitorous GOP party.

    Just my opinion but if Trump gets his way on this, your investigation into Trump personally will be shut down!
    Also, I do not believe Justice Kennedy left the bench of his own volition.

    Thanks Special Counsel! 🇺🇸🇺🇸

  18. trump is going to get off and do 8 years as the President…trump has every corrupt judge and GOP helping him to hurt american .. the sad part is american don't see it

  19. We are looking at the end of democracy here. If a president under investigation gets to appoint a lifetime justice who publically states that the president is immune to the law, then there is no hope left for our country.

  20. Life is a continuum. Conception is a human life. Abortion is unethical. Change my "mind" (disprove this fact)

  21. Love this guy to bits – but please it is your wisdom and experience that I love, Not your IMAGE – tell your make up artist to STOP……..

  22. Listen lets face it these guys are just really good op ed guys when they go in the tank for their respective political affiliation. Lets stop pretending it's anything else. I just hope Roberts prevents absurd redistricting by states and that they actually count votes. Every vote.

  23. Murkowski's statement very much is a non-answer to the question of whether or not she supports the nominee – so, she's going to vote to support him, but wants to avoid publicity. She cares less for "women's rights" than she claims, and more for helping the GOP be "the winning team"

    If she votes to confirm, vote her out.

  24. It's called stacking the deck . he's obviously guilty of multiple crimes, And is not shy about misusing the power of the office.

  25. Next up….RBG. “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day…." Well, y'all know the rest. #MAGA

  26. That's why there is a chain of succession, so when the Prez dies, is arrested or is incapacitated, there is a ready replacement.

  27. Waaaaa waaaaaa waaaaaa, you wacko lefties had your decades of agenda that failed; Obama and his staff of cronies showed you how dysfunctional you are. Selecting Kavanaugh is a part of cleaning up the mess made by Obama.

  28. Yeah, makes perfect sense. If the President commits hundreds of crimes, he shouldn't be asked questions about it because, obviously, he has important things to do, like committing hundreds more crimes.

  29. The ONLY reason chump wants this judge is because he doesn't believe a president should be subject to criminal investigations…we get HITLER all over again.. making this a dictatorship… we lose.

  30. So funny, no matter what, no matter who, no matter how, all of you would complain. Trump could have chosen someone far right , but did not, and you still are unhappy. After watching the protests I cannot stop laughing. https://youtu.be/_nekcBr_3wg

  31. Democrats may raise "hard questions", yet, they seem to bend when their investor give them pressure. Our system is so broken….

  32. Trump should not be able to pick the next Supreme Court Judge it. Would like a Bank Robber being made the President of a Bank. Totally Wrong just saying

  33. This is what happens when you play a stupid game you win a stupid prize. Progressive and Democratic didn’t take the election seriously. Now it’s to late. Let’s be honest everything the GOP and Russia did with all the investigations of Hillary and fake news and the hacking was not to get Republican voters against her but to get Democratic voters to turn on her, and it worked.

  34. So if a sitting president CAUSES the political or economic crisis, this wannabe Justice would prefer to allow the president to continue fomenting the crisis?
    I don't think you'd find ANY part of the Constitution that even APPEARS to support that stupid notion. Any human being can commit crimes. No one is incapable of crime. Therefore, making sitting presidents totally immune to consequences means that president can be all-powerful. In other words, an absolutist dictator. And we should be ashamed for wanting to stop him?
    That mindset makes as much sense as allowing babies to be snatched at the border and farmed out to loyal bordellos nationwide.
    This president has done just that. He has always had the power to demand the return of the children, or even to prevent the snatching in the first place. But he hasn't, because he doesn't want to. He, and any staffer under him, who participates in child napping, is a complicit criminal. This wannabe would put the president entirely above the law.
    I have to wonder what his mindset would be if he knew his viewpoint was now law, and some Democratic president decided to commit a few nice little crimes, himself. Even among Dems, there can be found perverts and pedophiles. Not to mention cretins. I think the one thing that nobody could accuse any Democrat of is being illiterate. At least they can read.

    We're reaching a point where, for whatever reasons, the Democratic leadership is failing to react with enough vehemence to this fascist regime. It may not mean they're cowards. It may only mean their owners don't want them to.
    Notwithstanding that, we have no choice but to elect Democrats, because they are the only ones who would NOT support kidnappings.
    We the People must make sure there will be a payback for this administration – a BIG one, and for ALL of them.

  35. So the day has finally arrived for me where I'm all out of outrage and unable to be further surprised. I've decided to accept the fact that America is slowly sliding into some sort of neofascism.

  36. The Senate hearing are meaningless cause nominees are prepped on how to answer questions which means they will lie just like tump's first appointee who claimed precedent are important and the foundation of our legal system then his first case it went again a 30 year precedent based on a poor case based on faulty evidence supporting changing the law. Clearly he did what his masters told him to do.

  37. Just because he says presidents shouldn't be investigated doesn't mean it is true or he is able to change the law..Roe vs Wade cannot be reversed.Who will take care of the babies/

  38. The big concern is to convince people to vote for the Democratic Party representatives, more energy and planning is something needed badly for this to happen.

  39. If all the liberals and women's rights people want to keep abortion legal they need to have congress pass a law that the President signs that will then be a legal law. Instead they have relied on a court ruling that is not a law. Just a right to not be prosecuted when you terminate a potential human and to have at least one clinic in every state. Get a law passed and you will never have to lose sleep again.

  40. we know why Trump supports this guy, he's the perfect puppet to get out of jail and still as president dummy.

  41. A non-elected wannabe president named don the con who is under FEDERAL INVESTIGATION is in NO position to nominate Justice.
    #GarlandWasCheatedOfHisNomination

  42. RBG is next to fall and be replaced. Hopefully soon. RvW? Your not playing the race card? Didn't Kav help the Russians? LMFAO! LOSERS.

  43. 2:19 so it should be the President's responsibility not to find himself accused by a credible accuser, accordig to his duty to protect the Office and its reputation.

  44. He said when he was confirmed to the lower appeals court it was settled law. In the migrant case, he was arguing that she needed to go back to her sponsor instead of being released straight form custody before she had an abortion.

  45. The Senate ain't gonna like this! Anyone that says that a President shouldn't be subject to criminal investigations needs to go. This isn't just about Donald Trump, but any President in our future. This affects both sides negatively. A Republican or Democratic President could wreak havoc unchecked in office.

    I TOLD YOU SO!!!😜

  46. If you are in a "red state" it is imperative that you call or email your Senator TODAY!!!!
    And if you're in a "blue state" call or email the "red state" Senator nearest you NOW!!!
    Let your voices be heard! Do NOT let Trump get away with yet another SCOTUS pick!
    "Truth above Politics… Always!"

  47. Defer. As in, prosecution after leaving office. If it comes to that, we need to defer any statutes of limitation as well. We need to assert the strictest and harshest penalties for convictions and revoke the ability for appeal. Special privilege should invoke special consequences. The purpose of prosecution, conviction and incarceration is to deter crime. If we allow any man to be free from such consequences we can expect corruption extraordinaire.

  48. I no longer recognize my country. Land of the free, home of the brave? We shall see. Meantimee:: Memo to Her Honor Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Senator John McCain. In Re: Justice Ginsburg. I am so sorry to announce that your retirement is hereby postponed indefinitely or until you are able to legally transfer the title to a certain house in Yorba Linda California. to a bewly minted ex president. Senator McCain: I know this is no time to be bothering you or its exactly the right time- we are in deep trouble. Possibly deeper than yours? (I don't don't don't llke saying that. Who has earned oeace and rest more than you ? That said, a speech delivered before the Senate, cc'd to select reps witha sticky not which says: " I am going to give you guys one last chance to reach down into to your pants in the hopes of finding something there, firm and properly resolving.

  49. Even the respected Supreme Court is becoming a joke. These people shouldnt have their jobs for life. Maybe every 10 years they should be replaced.

  50. When Trump is in jail for being a traitor to this nation, a concentrated political push needs to be set in motion to force congress to impeach and remove his ill gotten supreme court picks. Merrick Garland belongs on the bench and that stolen seat will never be forgotten.

  51. Mr. Kavanaugh, obviuosly, cannot comprehend the 14th Amendment to the Constitution:
    " . . . nor shall any State deprive any PERSON of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any PERSON within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

  52. https://www.needtoimpeach.com/    ///  POS Trump Pushes Lawyer Who Repped Russian Alfa Bank For Key DoJ Post | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC =   https://youtu.be/w0BY4jtsyAo  ///

  53. It doesn't matter what they ask.  They'll pretend their honest actors and non biased constitutional literalist.  Then they'll give more power the corporations, less access to health care, blows to unions, allow sexual orientation discrimination, less access to contraceptives, ban abortions ect… Bad day if your an immigrant or women in American. The right wing Christian republican moral and values are a mystery to me.  That from someone who hates the corruption in the democratic party.  At least they aren't willing to destroy our democracy and allowing this president to act a fool to get a few republican wish list items.

  54. Brett Kavanaugh is incredible I can't wait for this top pick Trump nominee to be confirmed . Now they can work on overturning Roe vs. Wade as too many babies' and father's rights have been violated for decades. Hopefully Ruth Ginsberg is on the way out and Trump will get another pick, we call it the "Supreme Trifecta".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *