Woman Threatens To Kill Abortion Provider


A FEDERAL COURT HAS RULED THAT A LOWER COURT’S
RULING INVOLVING A WOMAN WHO THREATENED AN ABORTION DOCTOR
CANNOT STAND, AND THAT WOMAN SHOULD FACE TRIAL, BECAUSE OF
THE THREATS THAT SHE SENT TO THE ABORTION PROVIDER. THE WOMAN IN
QUESTION HERE IS REFERRED TO AS AN ANTIABORTION ACTIVIST, AND
SHE HAS BEEN VERY AGGRESSIVE ABOUT HER TACTICS. LET ME GIVE YOU SOME MORE DETAILS. HER NAME
IS ANGEL DILLARD, AND SHE SAID THE FOLLOWING. I’M ALL MIXED
UP, SHE SAID A DOCTOR THE FOLLOWING THREAT. “WE KNOW
WHERE YOU SHOP, WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU DRIVE, WHERE YOU LIVE.
YOU SHOULD BE CHECKING UNDER YOUR CAR, BECAUSE MAYBE TODAY IS THE DAY SOMEONE PUTS AN EXPLOSIVE UNDER
IT.” THE DOCTOR
DECIDED SHE WAS NO LONGER GOING TO TRAIN OR OFFER ABORTION SERVICES IN HER
CLINIC. SHE WAS DEFINITELY INTIMIDATED, AND THE THREATS
DETERRED HER FROM DOING SOMETHING SHE FELT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO
DO IN THE STATE OF KANSAS. AFTER ANGEL DILLARD SENT OUT
THAT THREAT, A LOWER COURT SAID THAT THIS WAS PROTECTED FREE
SPEECH. HOWEVER, UPON APPEAL, THE TENTH U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNED THE DECISION,
SAYING THAT IT WAS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH. A SPLIT THREE-JUDGE APPEALS
PANEL SAID THAT THE DECISION ABOUT WHETHER THE
LETTER CONSTITUTED A TRUE THREAT SHOULD BE LEFT UP
TO A JURY TO DECIDE. YEAH, THIS WOMAN IS
DESPICABLE, AND THIS IS WHAT TERRORISTS DO. THEY TRY TO
TERRORIZE YOU UNTIL YOU CHANGE YOUR WAYS. SO, IN THIS CASE,
UNFORTUNATELY IT WORKED. THEY HAD NO ONE TO PROVIDE THE
SERVICE IN WICHITA KANSAS FOR FOUR YEARS BECAUSE THEY KILLED
THE PREVIOUS PROVIDER, KILLED BY SCOTT ROEDER, AND THEN
THEY RODE THE NEXT DOCTOR OUT OF TOWN, BASICALLY,
DETERRED HER PLANS TO PROVIDE ABORTIONS BY THREATENING
TO BLOW HER CAR UP. THEY ARE TERRORISTS. THAT RIGHT. IT IS IT IS ONE THING TO SEND OUT THREATS,
WHICH IS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED, AND IT IS ANOTHER
THING TO DO IN THE CONTEXT OF KANSAS. WE GET THREADS ON A
REGULAR BASIS, BUT IF YOU ARE IN THE CONTEXT OF AN ABORTION
PROVIDER ALREADY BEING MURDERED FOR WHAT HE WAS DOING IN THAT
EXACT SAME PLACE, THEN THESE THREATS ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN
LIGHTLY. THEY ARE VERY SERIOUS. THE LAWYER FOR DILLARD SAID THE
FOLLOWING. “IT IS DISTURBING THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SPEND RESOURCES GOING AFTER HER WHEN THE FBI AND THE DISTRICT JUDGE RULED THAT THERE WAS NO
EVIDENCE THAT HER LETTER WAS A THREAT.” WHEN YOU SAY YOU ARE GOING TO BE
CHECKING OUT YOUR CAR EVERY NIGHT BECAUSE SOMEONE IS GOING
TO BE PUTTING EXPLOSIVE UNDER IT, THAT IS A THREAT. I KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE, I KNOW
WHAT YOU DRIVE, I KNOW YOUR ROUTINE, YOU BETTER CHECK
UNDER YOUR CAR BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE A BOMB UNDER IT. IF THAT IS NOT A THREAT, WHAT
IS A THREAT? THE LAWYER SAID THAT HIS CLIENT IS A MUSICIAN,
AND A CHAPLAIN, AND A HOMEMAKER WHO HAS ALWAYS
DISAVOWED VIOLENCE. REALLY? EXCEPT FOR THAT THERE
IS MORE EVIDENCE OF OTHER THREATS AND ADVOCACY THAT SHE
HAS DONE IN FAVOR OF VIOLENCE. GO TO GRAPH NUMBER 27. SHE
IS TALKING ABOUT ROEDER IN THIS PLACE. “WITH ONE MOVE, ROEDER
WAS ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT WE HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO DO, SO HE
FOLLOWED HIS CONVICTIONS, AND I ADMIRE THAT.” SHE IS REFERRING
TO AN INDIVIDUAL WHO KILLED AN ABORTION PROVIDER. YOU ADMIRE
HIS CONVICTIONS? YOU ARE A VIOLENT, TERRIBLE HUMAN BEING. IF YOU ARE GOING TO PRANCE
AROUND SAYING YOU ARE PRO-LIFE, YOU BETTER CHECK YOURSELF. PRO-LIFE MEANS THAT YOU VALUE
HUMAN LIVES, VIABLE HUMAN LIVES, AND OBVIOUSLY SHE DOES
NOT, BECAUSE IF SOMETHING GOES AGAINST HER OWN RELIGIOUS
BELIEFS, SHE THINKS IT IS TOTALLY OKAY TO ADVOCATE FOR
THE MURDER OF THAT PERSON. COULD YOU IMAGINE IF A
MUSLIM AMERICAN SAID, HEY, MILITARY GENERAL LIVING IN THE
MIDDLE OF KANSAS, OR A LIEUTENANT, OR ANYONE, I KNOW
WHERE YOU LIVE, I KNOW WHERE YOU WORK, I KNOW
EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU, YOU BETTER CHECK YOUR CAR
FOR A BOMB UNDER IT. AND THEN HE SAID, I WENT TO TALK
TO MOHAMMED IN JAIL, AND I REALLY ADMIRE HIM FOR HAVING THE
COURAGE OF HIS PRINCIPLES AND TAKING ACTION. IT WOULD GO REALLY
WELL, ACTUALLY. THEY WOULDNíT SAY, THAT’S
JUST FREE SPEECH. PROTECTED. IMAGINE IF THAT GUY IS
TARGETING A WHITE WOMAN IN THE MIDDLE OF KANSAS. AFTER A WHITE
WOMAN HAD BEEN KILLED, OR A PERSON HAD BEEN KILLED THAT DID
THE SAME EXACT JOB AS HER. BUT SAY SHE’S A MILITARY RECRUITER.
YOU THINK THEY’RE NOT GONNA TREAT THAT GUY LIKE A TERRORIST?
WE HAVE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT STANDARDS IN THIS COUNTRY. WE
HAVE STANDARDS FOR WHETHER IT IS MUSLIMS, OR PEOPLE OF COLOR, AND
WE HAVE A DIFFERENT STANDARD IF YOU ARE RIGHT-WING. IF YOU ARE
RIGHT WING, YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING YOU LIKE AND WE HAVE LEGITIMATE
DISCUSSIONS AS TO WHETHER YOU ARE THREATENING PEOPLE OR NOT,
WHEN YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY THREATENING PEOPLE. YOUR
FRIENDS, LITERALLY HER FRIENDS ñ SHE SAID SCOTT ROEDER IS HER FRIEND ñ MURDERED SOMEONE.
YOU ARE A TERRORIST. WHAT IS INCREDIBLE IS THAT,
SOME PEOPLE MIGHT ARGUE THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS FILING
THIS LAWSUIT AGAINST HER SO SHE IS SUFFERING THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOME OF HER ACTIONS. TRUE, BUT
DOES UNDERSTAND THAT IN A DIFFERENT CONTESTS WHERE YOU ARE
DEALING WITH A MUSLIM, FOR THE SAKE OF THIS EXAMPLE, IF A
MUSLIM WAS SAYING ANYTHING LIKE THIS, THEY WOULD IMMEDIATELY BE
PLACED ON A TERRORIST WATCH LIST. THERE WOULD BE NO DISCUSSION, WHETHER OR
NOT IT IS TERRORISM. THE LOWER COURT RULED IN HER
FAVORITE. THAT’S JUST FREE SPEECH. COME ON, REALLY? YOU DONíT THINK THAT SAME COURT WOULD RULE
AGAINST A MUSLIM IF THEY SAID THEY HAD A BOMB UNDER YOUR CAR? EVERY
PERSON WATCHING THIS VIDEO, NO MATTER WHERE YOU ARE
THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM, YOU KNOW THEY WOULDN’T CALL THAT FREE SPEECH.

100 Replies to “Woman Threatens To Kill Abortion Provider”

  1. This is a veiled threat.  It's something that has ambiguity in case you're looking for a legal out, but you know the recipient understands what's being said.
    The problem with prosecuting veiled threats is the subjectivity of them.  A person can say: "I feel threatened" and that would be enough.  You can wrongly claim to have received a threat when you didn't.
    In the case of THIS threat, the whole "we know your private information" stuff pins the person potentially planting the bomb on her.
    You can say: "You better watch your mouth or something might happen to you", implying someone else might do something, but when you preface it with: "I know your private information", you've just implicated yourself as the only person capable of pulling it off, therefore we can deduce that you're referring to yourself.
    This lady is screwed, unless the conservative climate of that area tries to throw the case out on some technicality.

  2. If terrorism works and in the long run saves lifes what is so bad about it? If a threat that is carried out as 'I'm going to take this vacuum and suck your brain out so I can harvest your organs' isn't a crime then neither is this so you pieces of shit that support this murdering of the innocent and helpless shut the fuck up. At this time I would also like to say I am deeply sorry to any piece of shit I offended with my statement.

  3. Not a threat! Our judges are out of control, and religious nuts with money are making it happen. Take a good look at the guy that brought the citizens united law suit. He's a anti abortion republican nut bag. A nut bag because he would destroy our democracy to get what he wants.

  4. When you watch a video of an abortion being performed, you know that shit is not right, you can see how the fetus moves, that little being knows that is going to be killed. We are not talking about a sperm, the fetus is a complete being, it probably have a soul at that time already. So if the only way to stop that piece of shit from practicing abortions is scaring her, well done, she is just being paid in the same way.

  5. This kind of language is a threat. Trial.
    Reasonable use of this language would have said that the sender had "no intention of harm, but felt you should be aware of the dangers."

  6. "anti abortion activist" yes but I hate the euphamism "pro life".  Killing doctors and nurses who are just doing there jobs to show you are "pro life"?

  7. was the judge in this case also "pro life" which I put in quotes because I think there is much more to valuing life than being against abortion.

  8. Ladied and gentlemen from the same state that brought you Dorothy from The Wizard of OZ! We present to you…theee American TALIBAN!!

    whooping

  9. I don't really like how you use Muslims as an example. Yeah they are more likely to get put on a terrorist watch list but that's because you don't see radical Christians blowing people up in the name of God.

  10. I tell my followers not to tell anyone they are a member of the Timothean religion because they could be killed. That’s not a threat. It simply educating people. This woman needed to be educated that being a abortion doctor could get you killed if there was ever a war between good and evil.  The jury that decides this case should also know that if they support abortion that they and their children or grandchildren could be killed in a war between good and evil 50, 100 or thousand years from now. That’s just the truth and if you don’t want the truth then you chose death for your grandchildren.she didn't say, "I know" she said, "they know". You people are lying pieces of shit and someone needs to call you out on it.

  11. Department of Justice needs to file lawsuit against the Young Turks for lying and saying this woman said, "she knows where they live" when in fact she said, "they know where you live" as a warning to the dangers of being abortion doctor and not a threat. What was the woman’s name? I’m going to write the Department of Justice for them to  file a lawsuit against you.

  12. there is a caveat that circumvents the first amendment…its called 'fighting talk' and you can be prosecuted for something that incites violence

    use it

  13. Email to the Department of Justice:

      The Young Turks Anna and Cenk are spreading lies and inciting violence against a woman who said, "they know where you live" and "they could put a bomb under your car" as a warning to abortion doctors, their children and grandchildren of the dangers, if a war between good and evil ever breaks out. They are twisting the woman’s words by saying the woman is threatening the abortion doctors by claiming she said, "I know where you live" and "I will put a bomb under your car". Although there is free speech I heard the Justice Department could file a lawsuit against the Young Turks Anna and Cenk to put them out of business for their lying and inciting violence.

      I tell members of the Timothean religion they could be killed by insane people who do not believe abortion is premeditated first-degree child murder. Not that I’m threatening members of the Timothean religion but I’m educating them to the dangers of teaching the truth.

      This is the YouTube video they are using their news broadcasting agency to incite violence and teach lies.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cysq5Ka4mGY&spfreload=10

    Thank you
    Timothy Allen Campbell

  14. Yes threatening an abortion doctor is much worse than an abortion doctor crunching up babies in their 3rd trimester. Fucking sick

  15. So she is religious, admires a murderer. And in the context of something where violence already exists talks about blowing up people. Sounds familiar. Yeah she's a terrorist. I don't care if she calls herself a Christian and not a Muslim.

  16. Anyone who believes in abortion is a terrorist threat to unborn children and should be hauled off to the nearest FEMA camp to be aborted. They are not human beings they are just some kind of goo.

  17. I think both Cent and Ana have committed an act of terrorism by labeling unborn babies zygote and goo, to get people to murder them legally and should be charged with one account of premeditated murder and terrorism for every baby that was aborted since the 1960s. There’s no greater evil than someone who uses criminally insane rationalization to justify murdering unborn helpless babies. Not only have they lied about what this lady has said, they incited violence against her by calling her a terrorist.

  18. If it's called being a terrorist for THREATENING To kill an abortion provider, than what do you call people who are actually killing a fetus???

  19. Right Wing fucking assholes.  I'm sick of them.  Thankfully most are old fucking farts and ready to drop dead.  Nothing brings me more joy than reading the obituaries and seeing a bunch of old right wing assholes being buried.

  20. "pro-lifers" aren't really pro-life…they are pro-BIRTH…if they were really pro-life, they would care about what happens to the baby after it was born and they DON'T!

  21. the republicans are the greatest terriorist threat that america faces if you don't agree with these thugs you're in danger

  22. muslims and christians are the same six and a half of a dozen are the same they're both fanatics since i'm around more christians i will have to give them the most radial of the two

  23. Looks like Ana, Cenk and the Justice Department are a threat to national security because of their stupidity of not knowing the difference between a threat and a intelligence warning.

    If I have information Russia or China is going to bomb the United States, I can’t tell anybody, because my warning might be considered a threat. I have to keep that information secret.

    I’m going to write homeland security and let them know Ana, Cenk and the Justice Department is a threat to the national security of the United States.

  24. Email to Pres. Obama, August 9, 2015.
    Looks like Ana, Cenk from the Young Turks and the Justice Department are a threat to national security because of their stupidity of not knowing the difference between a threat and a intelligence warning. If I have information Russia or China is going to bomb the United States, I can’t tell anybody, because my warning might be considered a threat. I have to keep that information secret. A woman was giving abortion doctors intelligence warnings that someone could put a bomb underneath their car and the people at the Justice Department are so uneducated and ignorant they think that’s a threat. God gives a intelligent warning before he destroys and if you consider these intelligent warnings threats than unfortunately destruction comes without warning. If homeland security doesn’t sue the Justice Department, Ana  & Cenk for their ignorance and stupidity you will have no warnings before destruction.

  25. To all you pro lifers, the Bible talks about abortion's, something like if a woman becomes pregnant by another man not her husband give her this bitter something so she will abort the pregnancy.
    also you people are not pro life, you are only against women's choice, if you were pro life you would support all government programs which help the needy,and you would be against sending our young to die in these unnecessary wars,you would fight for insurance too provide contraceptives, what most so called pro lifers are crazy Bible Thumpers who select the parts of said Bible that fits their thinking and ignore the rest.
    This woman is a terrorist plain & simple

  26. So under her logic, we can threaten her the same way. HEY IT FREDOM OF SPEECH TO TELL SOMEONE YOUR GOING TO KILL THEM. " IN KANSAS".
    Sorry Kansas but you're filled with uneducated morons. STOP TAKING MONEY FROM YOUR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS!

  27. hahaha. This women just made a fool out of all pro life activists and I'm laughing about it. This is so hilarious. They're such jokes

  28. These 'pro-lifer' idiots fail to understand that human life can occasionally be more than 8" long. And then we come to the Ten Commandments. Which commandment says it's OK to kill someone who aborts babies?

  29. So someone who is against abortion, is prepared to kill a woman or doctor if an abortion is provided! Mmmmmmm let me think, yep definitely Wacko!

  30. if you look closely thats not a threat. she says they know where you live…… and someone will place a bomb under your car. she never said she was gonna do it. she was sayin that there are crazy people that would do that.

  31. She said it in the context of the abortion clinic killing babies. That makes it free speech. She fought fire with fire. Is it good? No. But if she made the death threat out of context, then it would be terrorism.  She actually said: "What if"  in front of all the statements – because she was countering the fact of what SHE considers MURDER. But of course, Young Turks, liberal liars, conveniently LEFT (haha) that out. Would you think that otherwise she had won the case? Yes, she's on thin ice. But she won because exactly this nuance. Look it up. And I'm getting sick of this Cenk dude saying on every video: "Imagine if it was a muslim" as if there's some war going on against muslims… There isn't. He used to be a muslim, right? He should know that the religious intolerence and all the death threats to him come from muslims – the death threats do not come from freedom loving people against muslims (although even that were true, they would be justified because THEY started first if you read THEIR not ours Quran)

  32. I don't advocate killing anyone, but in all honesty, the abortion provider makes his living by killing unborn children,

  33. funny thing about christian pro-lifers. they quote the bible supporting life but somehow ignore the parts in the bible that support abortion and murder…

  34. All significant anti-abortionists in America are White people. Every anti-abortionist in America who A) successfully shuts down an abortion clinic B) successfully passes a law to restrict abortion or C) successfully assassinates an abortion provider is a White person. 100% of them. Therefore it is logical to conclude that we do not have an anti-abortionist problem, we have a right-wing White people problem. To correct this problem, do as follows:

    1) Support mass non-White immigration to America, to reduce the White population of the country to an ethnic minority.
    2) Support interracial relationships and Mixed-race offspring between Whites and non-Whites, for the same reason.
    3) Support welfare, to enable non-Whites to reproduce faster than Whites.
    4) Sit back and laugh as 'White Christian America' dies.

    Conservatives in America only have power for as long as Whites are the ethnic majority. Once they aren't anymore (which they won't be by 2043), conservatives will be unable to get into power anymore – they don't have enough non-White voters to boost their numbers – which will ensure that liberals will control the country permanently for the foreseeable future, and thus abortion will remain legal and accessible.

    Want to keep abortion legal and accessible? Then follow the instructions above. Once Whites hit ethnic minority status, that's it – liberals win.

  35. This is AWESOME!  The clinic and shut down and nobody was hurt.  This is absolutely the best case scenario.  The clinic closed because they were afraid and that saved the lives of untold number of babies.  I do not condone violence, but if a clinic shuts down because of the fear of it I think that's a great thing.

  36. if a black person wrote such a letter they would be shot.and if they were middle eastern they would be kidnapped and tortured and sent to hole never to be found.

  37. I'm prolife but I want to make abortion antiquated by making prevention more efficient. I value life that's why I'm against death sentence as well. Sex Ed for girls needs to be more intricate with tracking ovulation so you are more aware of your body. I also think sex ed should be provided by hospitals not schools, done by nurses and doctors.

  38. I wonder what this potential murderer would do if some people sent her the same death threats, or even veiled threats. she is willing to kill to "save lives"? crazy cow!

  39. I mean, I can KINDA agree about being anti-abortion. But it isn't really a religious reason for me (I'm actually an atheist). I just see it as, you're essentially denying life.

    One counter-argument towards anti-abortionists, which I find strange, is when people say that the birth would ruin the child's life too, because the mother isn't equipped to handle the child. The mother wouldn't have to care for the child, it's called adoption. And yes, I understand that lifestyle is hard for a kid. Which is why I want to argue that the adoption system is out of control.

    I understand that giving birth is essentially the ultimate pain. That I will not deny. It's a very hard line to draw for me. I just think that denying the existence of a potential life, who are we to decide? I'd feel disturbed for the mother, of course, but I can't help but feel it's a little unethical. When a life is in the process of happening, cutting it off seems a little…careless. Depends what you focus on, the mother or the potential offspring. Whatever pain the mother has to face, it'll go away eventually. The "person" who's life is taken away, "he'll" never get the chance again (I have to put it in quotations because it isn't yet a person at that point). I just find it dark that we're preventing someone from experiencing life.

    You can argue it's also unethical to make the mother suffer through that type of pain. Either route you choose, it can be considered unethical in some form. But you have to decide which of the two is worse. The most horrible pain, but one that'll be over and dealt with? Is that worse? Or is it directly cutting off someone's potential life and denying them that freedom? Even if it's technically painless? Both are dark, but I see the latter as much worse. There are joys to life that one can't experience if they aren't, well, living.

    (I don't agree with the murder threats though. That's absurd, if she's being dead serious.)

  40. Gynaecologists provide a vast range of different but vital procedures specialist to women's reproductive health of which medical/surgical termination of pregnancy is one. I wish people would stop diminishing this medical/surgical specialism, for which medical doctors once qualified then have to further train and study for some years to accomplish, by continually degrading them as just abortionists.

  41. I am so sick of TYT ALWAYS bringing up muslims or blacks in these cases. Now this bitch needs to be flogged no doubt, but muslims and blacks already deal with a stacked deck and would probably be just as happy to not having themselves being brought into this particular fray. Maybe Cenk needs to use armed liberals or pro choice examples instead.

  42. Why doesn't Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Stephen Spielberg, George Lucas or any of the rich progressives of this country open abortion clinics. If I was rich I'd open a chain of McAbortion's. All talk and no action.

  43. TYT, don't forget this is the 25th Anniversary of the summer of "mercy," the summer that 30,000 anti-choice protesters ascended onto Wichita, Kansas. I am the clinic director of South Wind Women's Center, Dr. George Tiller's former clinic. We have been open for 3 years, and we expect about 500 protesters this year… maybe more. Keep us in your thoughts, and maybe stop by for some coverage. We will stay strong.

  44. On the woman who threatened to kill an abortion doctor.

     
    She should not have threatened the abortion Doctor, she should have used her constitutional right to bear arms to protect helpless infants by killing the doctor in self-defense and telling her story before twelve jurors that will decide if it was justifiable homicide.  If they find her guilty of killing the abortion Doctor and put her in prison for life it would be far better than spending the rest of eternity being burned and tortured in the lake of fire for not defending helpless infants when you had a constitutional right to bear arms to do so.  The law is not written in stone.  The jury decides whether killing an abortion Doctor is self-defense of a helpless infant or not.  The only reason why abortion is legal, is because some woman murdered her baby and the court decided it was her body.  If a man kills an abortion doctor, that tried to abort his son, that is a different court case and the trial can come out completely differently.  If a doctor tried to abort my son, I know I would use my constitutional right to bear arms to kill that Doctor and I know that the twelve jurors would find me an innocent hero and even if they didn’t, it would still be far better to get the death penalty for killing a abortion Doctor in self-defense of a helpless infant who use schizophrenic delusion of grandeur rationalization that a fetus was not human nor alive, then spend the rest of eternity being burned and tortured in the lake of fire for not defending my helpless infant son, who some people believe in their own schizophrenic delusion of grander mind, is not human or not alive.  There is no statute of limitation on infant murder.  Furthermore anyone purchases medical insurance is funding premeditated first-degree helpless infant killers.

  45. I think both parties are wrong. killings unborn babies is wrong but killing or threatening to kill abortionists is also wrong. You cannot fight evil with evil. Locking up the anti-abortionist terrorist would mean that justice would be served but the fact that an abortionist baby killer has ended her wicked practice also means that justice has been served- babies lives matter. This is conflicting for me.

  46. bad example. now this would be a more appropriate example. if that women had threatened a powerful politician or businessmen. then u would action. but so long as this is not the case. there is no movement.

  47. Surprise, surprise, when the terrorist finally went to trial in 2016, the jury acquitted her: https://rewire.news/article/2016/05/06/jurors-angel-dillard-case-say-activist-not-intend-intimidate-wichita-doctor/
    Terrorists, feel emboldened.
    Lovers of America, feel abandoned, because you have been.

  48. What part of Medicine dictates that murder is proper medical care?? Show me in the Oath where it says "do no harm except … "

    The abortion "doctor" should have their license to practice revoked.

  49. How could the lower court view this as free speech.Threatening to kill someone over and over is terrorism, not free speech.

  50. Blah blah blah.. More chenk farting out of his mouth.. And his little groomed lap dog ana, yipping and showing her teeth..lol. I hope all at tyt wake up tomorrow to a horrible house fire and are choked out of consciousness by smoke befor being consumed by flame.

  51. A lower court ruled that's protected speech? So if a Muslim threatened to blow up a building, would that be protected speech?

  52. If you don't want a abortions fair enough but don't make that choice for other people it's should be and I'm sure people do think long and hard about but at end of the day it's there choice and have to live with that choice

  53. The one sending threats is named Angel Dillards…More like angel of death, and again, she's threatening someone's life and she claims she a pro-lifer…You're entire life is an evil contradiction.

  54. Atrocious human being anyhow, but Angel is definitely a man's name and most chauvinists are also male, so I think that you've misinterpreted this predator's gender

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *